From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18187 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2010 17:26:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 18179 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jan 2010 17:26:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 17:26:07 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o06HQ5aB004874 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 12:26:06 -0500 Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o06HQ4KG017886; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 12:26:05 -0500 Message-ID: <4B44C7AC.5030809@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 17:26:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091209 Fedora/3.0-4.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: java@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: RFD: Precompile ecj [Was Re: GCCMain not found & test suite errors fatal?] References: <4B3CDCA7.70808@pon.net> <4B40C5A7.5020903@redhat.com> <4B40DE6F.1010003@pon.net> <4B40E279.3090601@redhat.com> <4B40E5A7.7090900@pon.net> <4B40E928.2090900@redhat.com> <7230133d1001040328x4557cd0cn8eba6443e8c74616@mail.gmail.com> <4B42A747.5080606@pon.net> <4B4311A5.1020707@redhat.com> <4B44BCBB.3040100@redhat.com> <4B44C18E.2020607@caviumnetworks.com> In-Reply-To: <4B44C18E.2020607@caviumnetworks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2 On 01/06/2010 04:59 PM, David Daney wrote: > Andrew Haley wrote: >> This makes ecj1 (and therefore gcj with Java source) much faster but >> takes 1m30s of CPU on a very fast computer. It doesn't really seem to >> make the build longer on a multi-CPU box, since it runs in parallel with >> the rest of the build AFAICS. Do you think we can get away with this? >> > > Seems reasonable to me. > > >> Andrew. >> >> >> 2010-01-06 Andrew Haley >> >> * Makefile.am (ecjx_LDFLAGS): Always precompile AWT. > > > This changelog mentions AWT. Is that correct? Almost certainly not. :-) Thanks, Andrew.