From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31281 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2011 08:43:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 31268 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Apr 2011 08:43:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:43:28 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3E8hRCK019732 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:43:27 -0400 Received: from zebedee.pink ([10.3.113.15]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p3E8hQJw014675; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:43:26 -0400 Message-ID: <4DA6B3AD.7090508@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:43:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110307 Fedora/3.1.9-0.39.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erik Groeneveld CC: "Boehm, Hans" , "java@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: GC leaks debugging References: <4D997D8C.9060903@redhat.com> <4D9993D4.9040704@redhat.com> <4D9ADA89.8000307@redhat.com> <4D9B112B.6000408@redhat.com> <4D9CB200.2000103@redhat.com> <4D9F13E9.7000106@redhat.com> <238A96A773B3934685A7269CC8A8D04272F0041802@GVW0436EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net> <4DA55ABC.1040505@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2 On 14/04/11 09:35, Erik Groeneveld wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: >> It looks like you're making progress, but I urge you to move to the >> new gc or your time may be wasted on the old one. > > The next step is to upgrade to that latest GCC and the latest GC and > the latest Lucene and have that running on Debian Testing. > > I will be looking into getting USE_MMAP to work, as I think that would > be a more definite solution. However if I enable it, it segvs. > > Are there any specific obstacles for USE_MUNMAP when used in GCJ, or > should it just work? MUNMAP, hmm. I don't know; it should work but there's no experience. Why do you want to munmap, anyway? Are you running out of swap space? Andrew.