From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6716 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2011 12:53:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 6697 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jul 2011 12:53:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_BF,TW_GC,TW_SG,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:53:33 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6BCrXc4008004 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 11 Jul 2011 08:53:33 -0400 Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn-113-63.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.63]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6BCrU2E025931; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 08:53:31 -0400 Message-ID: <4E1AF24A.6000205@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:53:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jie Liu CC: RTEMS Mailing List , java@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Joel Sherrill Subject: Re: RTEMS Port of GCJ Progress Report References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 On 08/07/11 18:31, Jie Liu wrote: > This is the second report after “GCJ Porting for RTEMS Status > Report”[1]. During this time, I am > --- Focusing on running the testsuite and fix encountered problem > --- Submitting patches to related community > > In details, I have got the testsuite result for boehm-gc, libffi and > libjava, which can be seen in rtemsgcj project’s trunk[2]. For > problems encountered in boehm-gc, they are fixed under Ivan’s help, > and the problems can be seen in mailing list[3](Just search rtems for > related information). For problems encountered in libjava, I have send > a mail to java-patches[4], some problems have been fixed while others > still in fixing. > > The patches have been send to related communities, although libjava’s > patch still needs modify. OK. You have to address Bryce's concerns, but I'm happy for the patch to go in once you've done that. Looking at the test results, there are very serious problems with both threads and exceptions. Andrew.