From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23917 invoked by alias); 15 Aug 2011 09:43:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 23893 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Aug 2011 09:43:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_WG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:43:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7F9hNes016196 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 15 Aug 2011 05:43:23 -0400 Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn-116-31.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.31]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7F9hKYM015696; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 05:43:21 -0400 Message-ID: <4E48EA37.6040300@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:43:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110621 Fedora/3.1.11-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jie Liu CC: java-patches@gcc.gnu.org, java@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Joel Sherrill Subject: Re: [PATCH] [JAVA] patch for Java on RTEMS References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2 On 08/10/2011 06:00 PM, Jie Liu wrote: > For the previous analysis "libjava patches for RTEMS"[1], there are 6 > cases need to pay more attention. PR18699, TLtest, Thread_Interrupt, > Thread_Sleep_2, Throw_2 and bclink. > > After add patch to bdwgc for RTEMS pthread support[2]: > PR18699 PASS after Modify [A bug in boehm-gc on > RTEMS, not related to libjava] > TLtest PASS > Thread_Interrupt PASS > > For the other 3 cases: > Thread_Sleep_2 PASS [After add patch to rtems] > Throw_2 PASS [After add patch to > libjava, still need some work][3] > bclink UnSupport > [-findirect-dispatch do not support in this case] > > I think it's time to send out the patch for review, because it may > need much time to modify. The patch is attached. Looks OK, but there is no ChangeLog. Do you have copyright assignment? Andrew.