From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28719 invoked by alias); 15 Aug 2011 14:11:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 28690 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Aug 2011 14:11:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_IB X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:11:01 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7FEB0hq018793 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:11:00 -0400 Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn-116-31.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.31]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7FEAv08016798; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:10:58 -0400 Message-ID: <4E4928F1.1010608@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:11:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110621 Fedora/3.1.11-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jie Liu CC: java-patches@gcc.gnu.org, java@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Joel Sherrill Subject: Re: [PATCH] [JAVA] patch for Java on RTEMS References: <4E48EA37.6040300@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 On 08/15/2011 03:07 PM, Jie Liu wrote: >> Looks OK, but there is no ChangeLog. Do you have copyright >> assignment? > > Have added ChangeLog to the patch, please see the attachment. And I > think I have copyright assignment, because I have Free Software > Foundation paperwork, as "ASSIGNMENT - GNU GCC ... JIE RT688742" Good. The libjava parts are OK; I can't approve the top-level part, but it looks fine. Andrew.