From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23684 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2012 16:33:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 23664 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Aug 2012 16:33:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_GC X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:33:29 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7UGXTXg007631 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:33:29 -0400 Received: from anchor.twiddle.home (vpn-224-193.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.224.193]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7UGXScY025254; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:33:28 -0400 Message-ID: <503F95D8.5010506@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:33:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Haley CC: Dehao Chen , Jason Merrill , Richard Guenther , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, David Li , java@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Set correct source location for deallocator calls References: <50228C38.5080703@redhat.com> <502294A1.3060800@redhat.com> <50243480.7090803@redhat.com> <50254A50.8070208@redhat.com> <50255B35.9020705@redhat.com> <50258712.4070002@redhat.com> <502E6774.8050609@redhat.com> <503F7876.7030606@redhat.com> <503F84A9.8010504@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <503F84A9.8010504@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2 On 08/30/2012 08:20 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: > Is the problem simply that the logic to > scan the assembly code isn't present in the libgcj testsuite? Yes, exactly. r~