From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31826 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2012 17:50:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 31814 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Nov 2012 17:50:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:50:39 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAQHoa09017666 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:50:38 -0500 Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn-113-82.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.82]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAQHoOW9007297; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:50:29 -0500 Message-ID: <50B3ABDF.3060307@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:50:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120911 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bryce McKinlay CC: GCC Java Subject: Re: [Gc] Re: boehm-gc merge for GCC References: <1353097280.505328435@f161.mail.ru> <50A67667.7020600@ubuntu.com> <1353099257.140499471@f123.mail.ru> <50A6EE27.4000605@ubuntu.com> <50ABADE0.9000305@redhat.com> <50B385C5.6010004@ubuntu.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 On 11/26/2012 05:03 PM, Bryce McKinlay wrote: > I'm not sure it's worth making it configure-time switchable. I'd just put it > on a branch, make sure it's working on the major platforms, and then merge > to trunk once the GCC tree goes back in to stage 1. That sounds very sensible. Andrew.