From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9046 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2012 20:50:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 9036 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Dec 2012 20:50:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_IB,TW_WG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from youngberry.canonical.com (HELO youngberry.canonical.com) (91.189.89.112) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Dec 2012 20:50:14 +0000 Received: from dslb-088-073-096-115.pools.arcor-ip.net ([88.73.96.115] helo=[192.168.42.216]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Teu0r-0002aE-Gn; Sat, 01 Dec 2012 20:50:13 +0000 Message-ID: <50BA6D7D.8020106@ubuntu.com> Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 20:50:00 -0000 From: Matthias Klose User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bryce McKinlay CC: GCC Java Subject: Re: [Gc] Re: boehm-gc merge for GCC References: <1353097280.505328435@f161.mail.ru> <50A67667.7020600@ubuntu.com> <1353099257.140499471@f123.mail.ru> <50A6EE27.4000605@ubuntu.com> <50ABADE0.9000305@redhat.com> <50B385C5.6010004@ubuntu.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2 Am 26.11.2012 18:03, schrieb Bryce McKinlay: > 2012 at 3:07 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: >> So if the merge looks that problematic, maybe restart with trunk, maybe >> check it in as bdwgc, and have toplevel configury to decide which one to use >> until the update is stable, and then just drop the boehm-gc directory? > > > I'm not sure it's worth making it configure-time switchable. I'd just put it > on a branch, make sure it's working on the major platforms, and then merge > to trunk once the GCC tree goes back in to stage 1. ok. so I'll use - branches/boehm for the import of the bdwgc branch - branches/gcj/bdwgc-20121125-merge for the merge proposal I'll start with what I currently have, and probably leave the libjava build on the branch broken for some time. At least its stage1 material. Instead I'll give the classpath merge priority, still considering it worth having for the 4.8 release. Matthias