From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26464 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2014 09:03:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26297 invoked by uid 89); 1 Sep 2014 09:03:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 09:03:55 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s8193nXR017992 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 1 Sep 2014 05:03:49 -0400 Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn-113-62.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.62]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s8193iMh018355; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 05:03:45 -0400 Message-ID: <54043670.4070908@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 09:03:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia , Mario Torre CC: "classpath@gnu.org" , kgy , "java@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: GCJ ------ file type not supported by system References: <540034B0.4010701@redhat.com> <1409306247.25913.21.camel@nirvana.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 On 29/08/14 11:00, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote: > Yes I know that anyone can work on GNU Classpath. But as in any OSS > project, a new project maintainer taking over "ownership" (in the OSS > sense of the word) would need to have the approval and the support of > the current maintainers. That would not be a problem. But really, there's no need to own the project: all patches are welcome. Andrew.