From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28185 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2014 11:22:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28068 invoked by uid 89); 5 Sep 2014 11:22:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 11:22:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s85BM9be013265 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 5 Sep 2014 07:22:10 -0400 Received: from zebedee.pink ([10.3.113.10]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s85BM8wc028325; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 07:22:08 -0400 Message-ID: <54099CDF.8020606@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 11:22:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia CC: Pekka Enberg , "classpath@gnu.org" , kgy , "java@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: Clarification and apologies (was Re: Re: GCJ ------ file type not supported by system) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2 On 09/05/2014 12:07 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote: > After reading in a previous post that Classpath was not being > "actively developed" anymore, I said that it would be a pity to let > the project die, and suggested that perhaps it was time to look for an > adopter (http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath/2014-August/003270.html) That was perhaps my fault; I said it was not being actively developed, when I should have said it was not much being actively developed. That's a subtle distinction, but one that matters to some people. Andrew.