From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-return-27391-listarch-java=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6222 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2014 18:04:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <java.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Id: <java.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/>
List-Post: <mailto:java@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6210 invoked by uid 89); 5 Sep 2014 18:04:03 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 18:04:02 +0000
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s85I3tCq003825	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL);	Fri, 5 Sep 2014 14:03:55 -0400
Received: from zebedee.pink ([10.3.113.10])	by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s85I3rJ3009767;	Fri, 5 Sep 2014 14:03:53 -0400
Message-ID: <5409FB08.5070705@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 18:04:00 -0000
From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian Jones <cbjones1@gmail.com>
CC: Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia <guille.rodriguez@gmail.com>,        Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,        "classpath@gnu.org" <classpath@gnu.org>, kgy <gykarsai@all.hu>,        "java@gcc.gnu.org" <java@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Clarification and apologies (was Re: Re: GCJ ------ file type not supported by system)
References: <CABDcavYPv=cG7UfR4vpum=mMWiQJ_JRUovxoTYRZeVp4hNACDA@mail.gmail.com>	<54099CDF.8020606@redhat.com> <CAACpEXK4z404M4u3qHd925xHHQKpYgbg=bGfazT1uEjKjY+mfA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAACpEXK4z404M4u3qHd925xHHQKpYgbg=bGfazT1uEjKjY+mfA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2

On 09/05/2014 06:53 PM, Brian Jones wrote:
> GCJ needs to use IcedTea.

What for?

> Unfortunately the difference between most Java developers who want
> to compile Java to a native executable and a GCC hacker is vast.

Hard to argue with that.

Andrew.