Here is a patch that fixes a bug introduced with my patch. Im sorry
for the first mistake.
I was unable to run make check on my mac laptop, but will do it on my
linux box in 30 min
or so.

Martin

2009-09-07  Martin Thuresson  <martin@mtme.org>

	* binutils/addr2line.c (slurp_symtab): Fixed pointer bug.


On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Martin Thuresson <martin@mtme.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 09:18:35AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 01:23:33AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> > It's the one applied to the binutils subdirectory.
>>>
>>> It is probably the addr2line.c change.  Try this:
>>
>> That's not the right patch, but does identify the breakage..
>> bfd_read_minisymbols ought to take a void * param instead of void **,
>> I think.
>
> The issue in questions seems to be my patch from here:
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-09/msg00276.html
>
> I cant recall why my change stopped the -Wc++-error. Ill take
> a look and will submit a fix.
>
> Martin
>
>
> Excerpt:
>
> diff -u -u -p -r1.33 addr2line.c
> --- binutils/addr2line.c        2 Sep 2009 07:22:31 -0000       1.33
> +++ binutils/addr2line.c        9 Sep 2009 23:01:26 -0000
> @@ -102,13 +102,14 @@ slurp_symtab (bfd *abfd)
>  {
>   long symcount;
>   unsigned int size;
> +  void *minisyms = &syms;
>
>   if ((bfd_get_file_flags (abfd) & HAS_SYMS) == 0)
>     return;
>
> -  symcount = bfd_read_minisymbols (abfd, FALSE, (void *) &syms, &size);
> +  symcount = bfd_read_minisymbols (abfd, FALSE, &minisyms, &size);
>   if (symcount == 0)
> -    symcount = bfd_read_minisymbols (abfd, TRUE /* dynamic */, (void
> *) &syms, &size);
> +    symcount = bfd_read_minisymbols (abfd, TRUE /* dynamic */,
> &minisyms, &size);
>
>   if (symcount < 0)
>     bfd_fatal (bfd_get_filename (abfd));
>