From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-return-9700-listarch-java=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28751 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2002 17:30:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/>
List-Post: <mailto:java@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28734 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2002 17:30:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO gash2.peakpeak.com) (207.174.178.17)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Apr 2002 17:30:38 -0000
Received: from creche.cygnus.com (ta0200.peakpeak.com [204.144.244.200])
	by gash2.peakpeak.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA04771;
	Tue, 9 Apr 2002 11:30:35 -0600
Received: (from tromey@localhost)
	by creche.cygnus.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA16577;
	Tue, 9 Apr 2002 11:33:05 -0600
To: "Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm@hp.com>
Cc: "'java@gcc.gnu.org'" <java@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with interpreted double operations on IA64
References: <40700B4C02ABD5119F000090278766443BF19D@hplex1.hpl.hp.com>
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com
X-Attribution:  Tom
X-Zippy:  Is it clean in other dimensions?
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 10:51:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: "Boehm, Hans"'s message of "Tue, 9 Apr 2002 09:33:51 -0700"
Message-ID: <871ydokca6.fsf@creche.redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00149.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Hans" == Boehm, Hans <hans_boehm@hp.com> writes:

Hans> Could someone point me at a description of exactly how type
Hans> __java_double should differ from double?  As far as I can tell,
Hans> __java_double is used primarily by the interpreter?

jdouble really should be used everywhere.  There's probably been some
mistakes made and `double' is used occasionally instead.

Tom