From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6216 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2002 21:10:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6201 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2002 21:10:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gash2.peakpeak.com) (207.174.178.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Apr 2002 21:10:26 -0000 Received: from creche.cygnus.com (ta0203.peakpeak.com [204.144.244.203]) by gash2.peakpeak.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA24963; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:10:18 -0600 Received: (from tromey@localhost) by creche.cygnus.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA29281; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:16:00 -0600 To: Jeff Sturm Cc: Matthias Klose , java@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [3.1 branch] libgcjgc's soname conflicts with gcc-3.0's? References: From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom X-Zippy: I'm changing the CHANNEL.. But all I get is commercials for ``RONCO MIRACLE BAMBOO STEAMERS''! Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:56:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Jeff Sturm's message of "Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:53:20 -0400 (EDT)" Message-ID: <87elh7l9io.fsf@creche.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00312.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Sturm writes: >> In the 3.0 and 3.1 branch, libgcjgc.so.1.0.1 is used. Is this >> intended, or should the soname changed for the 3.1 release? If not, >> can the libgcjgc.so.1.0.1 from 3.1 used as a replacement for 3.0's >> libgcjgc? Jeff> Actually I don't think libgcjgc.so is used anymore, and needn't Jeff> be installed, right? I was just going to say the same thing. I think the same applies to zlib as well. We can just use noinst_ and then we don't need to worry about the soname. Tom