* Bug in configure.in
@ 2002-04-16 8:01 Martin Kahlert
2002-04-16 8:49 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Martin Kahlert @ 2002-04-16 8:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc; +Cc: java
Hi!
The newest snapshot refuses to build libgcj on my Solaris box
(sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7)
I assume it's because config.guess now uses sparcv9 instead of plain sparc.
This is the patch i use, but no idea, whether it's correct:
*** gcc-20020415.old/configure.in Mon Apr 15 20:59:13 2002
--- gcc-20020415/configure.in Tue Apr 16 15:57:09 2002
***************
*** 1010,1018 ****
use_gnu_ld=no
fi
;;
! sparc-*-solaris*)
case "${host}" in
! sparc-*-solaris2.8)
# According to Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>, libjava
# won't build correctly on Solaris 8 if there's a
# previously-installed version of GCC in the configured prefix.
--- 1010,1018 ----
use_gnu_ld=no
fi
;;
! sparc*-*-solaris*)
case "${host}" in
! sparc*-*-solaris2.8)
# According to Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>, libjava
# won't build correctly on Solaris 8 if there's a
# previously-installed version of GCC in the configured prefix.
--
The early bird catches the worm. If you want something else for
breakfast, get up later.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: Bug in configure.in
2002-04-16 8:01 Bug in configure.in Martin Kahlert
@ 2002-04-16 8:49 ` Tom Tromey
2002-04-16 9:04 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2002-04-16 8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: martin.kahlert; +Cc: gcc, java
>>>>> "Martin" == Martin Kahlert <martin.kahlert@infineon.com> writes:
Martin> The newest snapshot refuses to build libgcj on my Solaris box
Martin> (sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7)
Martin> I assume it's because config.guess now uses sparcv9 instead of
Martin> plain sparc.
My understanding is that rth is going to back out the config.guess
change. So I think we don't need this patch, we just need to wait.
Richard, if the config.guess patch is staying, please tell me.
Thanks.
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug in configure.in
2002-04-16 8:49 ` Tom Tromey
@ 2002-04-16 9:04 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2002-04-16 9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tromey; +Cc: martin.kahlert, gcc, java
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Date: 16 Apr 2002 09:52:04 -0600
My understanding is that rth is going to back out the config.guess
change. So I think we don't need this patch, we just need to wait.
Richard, if the config.guess patch is staying, please tell me.
Thanks.
Richard backed out the config.guess changes this morning.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-04-16 15:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-04-16 8:01 Bug in configure.in Martin Kahlert
2002-04-16 8:49 ` Tom Tromey
2002-04-16 9:04 ` David S. Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).