* why isn't --with-threads=posix the default for linux?
@ 2002-04-22 20:45 Adam Megacz
2002-04-23 14:56 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Adam Megacz @ 2002-04-22 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java
Why does it default to no threads?
- a
--
The web is dead; long live the Internet.
http://www.xwt.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: why isn't --with-threads=posix the default for linux?
2002-04-22 20:45 why isn't --with-threads=posix the default for linux? Adam Megacz
@ 2002-04-23 14:56 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2002-04-23 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adam Megacz; +Cc: java
>>>>> "Adam" == Adam Megacz <gcj@lists.megacz.com> writes:
Adam> Why does it default to no threads?
We follow what gcc does. I don't recall why gcc defaults to no
threads. It might just be that nobody wrote a patch for it.
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-04-23 21:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-04-22 20:45 why isn't --with-threads=posix the default for linux? Adam Megacz
2002-04-23 14:56 ` Tom Tromey
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).