public inbox for
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: majia gm <>
To: Java List <>
Subject: Must unwind in gcc be ported for gcj?
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 01:19:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)

Hi, everyone.

I'm porting gcj (gcc-4.4.2) to another platform. Right now the gij
fails when interpreting the following program.


import B;
public class A{

	public static void main(String args[])
			B b=(B)Class.forName("B").newInstance();
		catch(Exception e)
			System.out.println("Cannot find Class B");


public class B

I use gdb to track gij, and I found GetCallingClass() in forName()
returns NULL, then the bootstrap loader is used to search the Class B
but with no result. Should the Class B has the same class loader, the
system class loader as the Class A dose?

Then I track the GetCallingClass(), and I found it needs the unwind
function provided by gcc.  Must I port the unwind function?

             reply	other threads:[~2011-02-24  1:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-24  1:19 majia gm [this message]
2011-02-24  2:34 ` David Daney
2011-02-24 10:07 ` Bryce McKinlay

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).