From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2555 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2012 18:41:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 2539 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Feb 2012 18:41:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_GC X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-bk0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-bk0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:41:44 +0000 Received: by bke17 with SMTP id 17so604605bke.20 for ; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:41:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.150.82 with SMTP id x18mr9236220bkv.51.1328553703307; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:41:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.65.67 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:41:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4F301943.4070809@redhat.com> From: Harpal Grover Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Is GCJ still active? To: GCC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2 On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > > On 02/05/2012 06:33 PM, =E5=AD=99=E6=B3=A2=E7=BF=94 wrote: > > > I am doing a project(open source) and need to complie some java > > *.class files to *.dll and *.so files so that this files can run > > without jre. > > > > I found there only have to tools can do it: Jet and GCJ. > > > > Jet is not under GPL license. And the latest release of GCJ was on Sep > > 22, 2009. I need to compile the java files and support JDK 1.7 > > features. So does GCJ still active and may support JDK 1.7 in future? > > gcj ahas been released several times since then. =C2=A0There is a little > development still going on, but at present there are no plans to do > a release that supports Java 1.7 features. > > Andrew. So naturally, the next question then would be: Will there be any capabilities to compile java applications to native binaries using the OpenJDK? If not, who should we contact to convey the ever so popular and=C2=A0growing=C2=A0interest in being able to do this= for Linux, OS X and Windows? -- Harpal Grover President Harpal Grover Consulting Inc