public inbox for java@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jie Liu <lj8175@gmail.com>
To: RTEMS Mailing List <rtems-users@rtems.org>,
	java@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com>
Subject: RTEMS Port of GCJ Progress Report
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 17:31:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABc96T_KbAp5dPwTHMDxRQs4qwXpxpbGHc9nyLVoSrZuXLuOhg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hi,

This is the second report after “GCJ Porting for RTEMS Status
Report”[1]. During this time, I am
--- Focusing on running the testsuite and fix encountered problem
--- Submitting patches to related community

In details, I have got the testsuite result for boehm-gc, libffi and
libjava, which can be seen in rtemsgcj project’s trunk[2]. For
problems encountered in boehm-gc, they are fixed under Ivan’s help,
and the problems can be seen in mailing list[3](Just search rtems for
related information). For problems encountered in libjava, I have send
a mail to java-patches[4], some problems have been fixed while others
still in fixing.

The patches have been send to related communities, although libjava’s
patch still needs modify. For boehm-gc, the patch can be seen on
java-patches mailing list[5]. For RTEMS, the patch can be seen on
RTEMS mailing list[6]. For libjava, the patch also can be seen on
java-patches mailing list[7]. The libffi is worked on RTEMS/i386, so
there is no patch for it.

Next step, I will
+++ Make as more libjava test case PASS as possible and get the
libjava patch merged
+++ Move to a new architecture and repeat the porting progress

If you have any ideas on this project, please do not hesitate to contact me. :)

[1] http://www.rtems.org/pipermail/rtems-users/2011-June/008574.html
[2]http://rtemsgcj.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/gcjtest/testsuite_out
[3] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.programming.garbage-collection.boehmgc
[4] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2011-q3/msg00016.html
[5] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2011-q2/msg00067.html
[6] http://www.rtems.org/pipermail/rtems-users/2011-June/008573.html
[7] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2011-q3/msg00001.html

Best Regards,
Jie

             reply	other threads:[~2011-07-08 17:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-08 17:31 Jie Liu [this message]
2011-07-11 12:53 ` Andrew Haley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CABc96T_KbAp5dPwTHMDxRQs4qwXpxpbGHc9nyLVoSrZuXLuOhg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=lj8175@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=java@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com \
    --cc=rtems-users@rtems.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).