From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-return-27233-listarch-java=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9180 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2013 01:16:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 9170 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jan 2013 01:16:03 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_IB
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f182.google.com) (209.85.214.182)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 01:15:57 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id uo13so111896obb.41        for <java@gcc.gnu.org>; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:15:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.42.97 with SMTP id n1mr10530223obl.91.1358644556943; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:15:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.12.100 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:15:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20130119152716.GA4052@bromo.med.uc.edu>
References: <20130119152716.GA4052@bromo.med.uc.edu>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 01:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CALUNu-qKC=vvq3MGpj1qcnFg5Bi2kXgmsq3mnzSM4-DLYyFm-g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: shouldfail'ing sourcelocation
From: Bryce McKinlay <bmckinlay@gmail.com>
To: Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu>
Cc: java@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <java.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Id: <java.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/>
List-Post: <mailto:java@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2

On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote:
>    How exactly can we shouldfail the sourcelocation test on those
> platforms like darwin which don't support dwarf4...

This should be an 'xfail', not a 'shouldfail'.

Unfortunately I don't think we ever had a mechanism to do
platform-specific xfails in the libjava testsuite. You could certainly
add that, but maybe just making the line numbers work would be a more
productive use of time :)

Note you don't need dwarf4 to make sourcelocation work (comment in the
test case is a bit misleading). You just need some way to read the
source line number info, whatever format it is in.