From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-return-26965-listarch-java=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31523 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2011 09:32:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 31515 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Sep 2011 09:32:05 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_IB
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (HELO mail-qy0-f182.google.com) (209.85.216.182)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:31:51 +0000
Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so533409qyk.20        for <java@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 02:31:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.199.105 with SMTP id er41mr7672728qcb.69.1317288710353; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 02:31:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.74.81 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 02:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E8445DE0200007800058686@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
References: <4E8445DE0200007800058686@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:32:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CALUNu-rTAeDOy+v+FcTMgvzdCDGvhP3Wg2_vF6KA3cEYwYsVog@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: libjava build failure with read-only source tree
From: Bryce McKinlay <bmckinlay@gmail.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: java@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <java.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Id: <java.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/>
List-Post: <mailto:java@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:

> --- a/libjava/classpath/tools/Makefile.am
> +++ b/libjava/classpath/tools/Makefile.am
> @@ -371,6 +371,7 @@ endif
> =A0## BEGIN GCJ LOCAL
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0cp -pR $(srcdir)/asm .
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0cp -pR $(srcdir)/classes .
> + =A0 =A0 =A0 find asm classes -type d -exec chmod u+w \{\} \;
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0if [ -d asm/.svn ]; then \
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0find asm classes -depth -type d -name .svn -exec rm -r=
f \{\} \;; \
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0fi

This patch looks fine to me, though I wonder if there is any good
reason why "cp -p" was used in the first place?

In any case, I'd say you can go ahead and check this in under the
"obvious" rule.

Bryce