From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3331 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2014 20:07:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3313 invoked by uid 89); 4 Sep 2014 20:07:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-we0-f180.google.com Received: from mail-we0-f180.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f180.google.com) (74.125.82.180) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 20:07:25 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id w61so10812011wes.39 for ; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 13:07:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.207.6 with SMTP id ls6mr8653109wic.48.1409861242242; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 13:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.12.2 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 13:07:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <540034B0.4010701@redhat.com> <1409306247.25913.21.camel@nirvana.localdomain> <54043670.4070908@redhat.com> <1409568429.4242.1.camel@nirvana.localdomain> <54089094.5080907@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 20:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Re: GCJ ------ file type not supported by system From: Pekka Enberg To: Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia Cc: "classpath@gnu.org" , kgy , "java@gcc.gnu.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 El jueves, 4 de septiembre de 2014, Pekka Enberg escri= bi=C3=B3: >> No, it's really not unfair at all. You are basically saying Andrew is >> doing a crappy job as a maintainer On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote: > No, I am definitely NOT saying that, nothing even close. Please don't put > your words in my mouth, thank you. Of course you are saying that. Why else would you even bring up the issue of finding a "competent successor" which implies that Andrew is no longer interested in GNU Classpath and neglecting its maintenance? El jueves, 4 de septiembre de 2014, Pekka Enberg escri= bi=C3=B3: >> Once you answer the hypothetical question *who* should >> be the successor, you will understand why. On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote: > I see, so if I don't have the answer, the question makes no sense. Ok. You didn't even try to answer the question, did you? If Andrew actually needed a "competent successor" (he doesn't), what is required of that person? The person needs to be an active developer, needs to understand GNU Classpath well, and has to have support from people who actually developed the project, right? Are you able to make an educated guess who actually meets that criteria? - Pekka