From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21492 invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2008 18:21:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 21483 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Jul 2008 18:21:15 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from cp-out2.libero.it (HELO cp-out2.libero.it) (212.52.84.102) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:20:46 +0000 Received: from libero.it (192.168.17.12) by cp-out2.libero.it (8.5.014) id 4887348100A2D8E6; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:20:37 +0200 Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:21:00 -0000 Message-Id: Subject: Re: gcj 4.4 and AWT toolkit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sensitivity: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "ffileppo" To: "aph" Cc: "java" X-XaM3-API-Version: 4.3 (R1) (B3pl25) X-SenderIP: 151.61.154.18 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00059.txt.bz2 > > As you said, it doesn't even seem to try to open libgtkpeer > > > > root@portatile-hp:/media/disk/x86-gcc-inst/bin# strace -f ./awt-test=20 > > Debugging time; you're either going to have to do it yourself or > persuade someone to help you. > > Andrew. > Any hints where to start understading this problem? Just debugging with gdb? I wonder if this bad behaviour is caused by the recent merge of classpath 0= .97.2 I hope more people will concern about this issue; personally I can't wait t= o test the performance of AWT/SWING code compiled with gcj compared with by= tecode execution (especially on embedded systems). We should team up to sol= ve this problem :-) If you're interested, please take a look at my other post (http://gcc.gnu.o= rg/ml/java/2008-06/msg00031.html) about gcc 4.3.2 and 4.3.0/1 bug with AWT/= SWING code (beacause of classpath 0.96?) Thanks for your help, Francesco