From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30012 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2002 20:53:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30005 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2002 20:53:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cc730106-b.taylor1.mi.home.com) (68.40.33.180) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Apr 2002 20:53:27 -0000 Received: from localhost (jsturm@localhost) by cc730106-b.taylor1.mi.home.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA13062; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:53:20 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: mars.deadcafe.org: jsturm owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:55:00 -0000 From: Jeff Sturm X-Sender: jsturm@mars.deadcafe.org To: Matthias Klose cc: java@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [3.1 branch] libgcjgc's soname conflicts with gcc-3.0's? In-Reply-To: <15556.21844.171967.330409@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00309.txt.bz2 On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Matthias Klose wrote: > In the 3.0 and 3.1 branch, libgcjgc.so.1.0.1 is used. Is this > intended, or should the soname changed for the 3.1 release? If not, > can the libgcjgc.so.1.0.1 from 3.1 used as a replacement for 3.0's > libgcjgc? Actually I don't think libgcjgc.so is used anymore, and needn't be installed, right? I'll post a patch. Jeff