From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-return-26827-listarch-java=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8859 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2011 19:54:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 8839 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jan 2011 19:54:22 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from relay00.pair.com (HELO relay00.pair.com) (209.68.5.9)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:54:17 +0000
Received: (qmail 88386 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2011 19:54:14 -0000
Received: from 195.135.221.2 (HELO d95.suse.de) (195.135.221.2)  by relay00.pair.com with SMTP; 27 Jan 2011 19:54:14 -0000
X-pair-Authenticated: 195.135.221.2
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:54:00 -0000
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
cc: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,     Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, java@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Another Python namespace pollution (was: r147958 - in /trunk/libstdc++-v3: ChangeLog Mak...)
In-Reply-To: <20110127105952.GC5165@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1101272052540.7158@gerinyyl.fvgr>
References: <20090528171422.508.qmail@sourceware.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0905282258430.24872@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <m33aan21h4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0905291955130.18075@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <m3y6sfzk3y.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <m3ljofzhtd.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1101021134130.4999@gerinyyl.fvgr> <20110127103801.GA5165@redhat.com> <AANLkTikxP-MPRBiy-HU55LwtD63Wb+c8Roa6ikJjPhzx@mail.gmail.com> <20110127105952.GC5165@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <java.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Id: <java.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/>
List-Post: <mailto:java@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2

On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Gary Benson wrote:
>> The files should reside in a directory that is private to gcc or
>> at least mangled with the gcc version it comes from.  Otherwise
>> multiple parallel gcc installations conflict.
> Ah, ok, that shouldn't be too hard.  I'll get working on a patch.

Thanks!

In case you are wondering where to put them, there is prior art
based on Tom's fix:

  ./share/gcc-4.6.0/python/libstdcxx/__init__.py       <--- The good
  ./share/gcc-4.6.0/python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py
  ./share/gcc-4.6.0/python/libstdcxx/v6/__init__.py
  ./share/python/classfile.py                          <--- The bad
  ./share/python/aotcompile.py
  ./lib/libstdc++.so.6-gdb.py                          <--- The ugly :-)
 
Gerald