From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29374 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2014 16:01:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29351 invoked by uid 89); 24 Nov 2014 16:01:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: ainaz.pair.com Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 16:01:05 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.132] (vie-91-186-144-206.dsl.sil.at [91.186.144.206]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 195AB3F4BC; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 11:01:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 16:01:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, java@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: GCC 5 fallout: libdata/pkgconfig/libgcj-5.0.pc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 On Saturday 2014-08-23 12:38, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Packaging last week's GCC 5 snapshot, I ran into a couple of issues > due to the version number change. > > One is this: We are still creating libdata/pkgconfig/libgcj-5.0.pc > as we used to create libgcj-4.10.pc. > > Shouldn't that be libgcj-5.pc now? Ping. If it was 4.10 before, should it really not be just 5 now? Gerald