From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-return-26359-listarch-java=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18709 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2009 14:19:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 18685 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Oct 2009 14:19:46 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:19:43 +0000
Received: from zps77.corp.google.com (zps77.corp.google.com [172.25.146.77]) 	by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n93EJfbB018455; 	Sat, 3 Oct 2009 07:19:41 -0700
Received: from ywh15 (ywh15.prod.google.com [10.192.8.15]) 	by zps77.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n93EJcxa025551; 	Sat, 3 Oct 2009 07:19:38 -0700
Received: by ywh15 with SMTP id 15so1507947ywh.5         for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 07:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.101.134.36 with SMTP id l36mr3898758ann.133.1254579578111;  	Sat, 03 Oct 2009 07:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4AC75C06.8090901@moene.org>
References: <b798aad50910030439n270ec28ch4640083c61dd031e@mail.gmail.com> 	 <4AC75C06.8090901@moene.org>
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:19:00 -0000
Message-ID: <b798aad50910030719p24a4f40bt92f8365a9b39aa@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Trunk is closed for LTO merge
From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>
To: Toon Moene <toon@moene.org>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, java@gcc.gnu.org, fortran@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-System-Of-Record: true
Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <java.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Id: <java.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/>
List-Post: <mailto:java@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2

On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 10:13, Toon Moene <toon@moene.org> wrote:

> Will the merge allow lto by default (so that we do not have to specify
> --enable-lto) ?

If the correct version is found, yes.  This is the same behaviour that
is implemented in the lto branch.

> Or do we have to force it, like on the branch ?

You never had to force it on the branch, either.  The only reason I
kept asking folks to force it was simply to make sure that 'configure'
was finding the right libelf.  If libelf is not installed and you
force LTO, configure complains.  Otherwise, configure silently
disables LTO.


Diego.