* error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
@ 2009-07-16 12:38 Mathieu Malaterre
2009-07-19 6:02 ` Florian Weimer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Malaterre @ 2009-07-16 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java
Hi there,
I am trying to compile VTK using gcj and I am getting those compiler
error, could someone please let me know if the code is legal (should
compile) or not:
$ make
...
In file included from
/home/mathieu/Kitware/VTK/Graphics/vtkJavaProgrammableFilter.cxx:25:0:
/home/mathieu/Kitware/VTK/Graphics/vtkJVMManager.h:34:3: error:
'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
/home/mathieu/Kitware/VTK/Graphics/vtkJVMManager.h:33:3: error: with
'jvariant::jvariant(jboolean)'
/home/mathieu/Kitware/VTK/Graphics/vtkJavaProgrammableFilter.cxx: In
member function 'virtual int
vtkJavaProgrammableFilter::FillInputPortInformation(int,
vtkInformation*)':
/home/mathieu/Kitware/VTK/Graphics/vtkJavaProgrammableFilter.cxx:157:159:
error: conversion from 'jvariant' to 'jboolean' is ambiguous
/home/mathieu/Kitware/VTK/Graphics/vtkJVMManager.h:52:3: note:
candidates are: jvariant::operator __jstring*() <near match>
/home/mathieu/Kitware/VTK/Graphics/vtkJVMManager.h:51:3: note:
jvariant::operator __jobject*() <near match>
/home/mathieu/Kitware/VTK/Graphics/vtkJVMManager.h:50:3: note:
jvariant::operator jdouble()
/home/mathieu/Kitware/VTK/Graphics/vtkJVMManager.h:49:3: note:
jvariant::operator jfloat()
/home/mathieu/Kitware/VTK/Graphics/vtkJVMManager.h:48:3: note:
jvariant::operator jlong()
/home/mathieu/Kitware/VTK/Graphics/vtkJVMManager.h:47:3: note:
jvariant::operator jint()
/home/mathieu/Kitware/VTK/Graphics/vtkJVMManager.h:46:3: note:
jvariant::operator jshort()
/home/mathieu/Kitware/VTK/Graphics/vtkJVMManager.h:45:3: note:
jvariant::operator jchar()
/home/mathieu/Kitware/VTK/Graphics/vtkJVMManager.h:44:3: note:
jvariant::operator jbyte()
/home/mathieu/Kitware/VTK/Graphics/vtkJVMManager.h:43:3: note:
jvariant::operator jboolean()
Ref:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/Graphics/vtkJVMManager.h?view=markup
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/Graphics/vtkJavaProgrammableFilter.cxx?view=markup
Thanks,
--
Mathieu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
2009-07-16 12:38 error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded Mathieu Malaterre
@ 2009-07-19 6:02 ` Florian Weimer
2009-07-19 7:52 ` Andrew Haley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Florian Weimer @ 2009-07-19 6:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mathieu Malaterre; +Cc: java
* Mathieu Malaterre:
> I am trying to compile VTK using gcj and I am getting those compiler
> error, could someone please let me know if the code is legal (should
> compile) or not:
This is legal per Sun's JNI specficiation: jboolean and jbyte are
distinct types because there signedness differs:
<http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/jni/spec/types.html#wp198>
It's a bug in GCC.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
2009-07-19 6:02 ` Florian Weimer
@ 2009-07-19 7:52 ` Andrew Haley
2009-07-19 8:17 ` Florian Weimer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Haley @ 2009-07-19 7:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Weimer; +Cc: Mathieu Malaterre, java
On 07/19/2009 07:02 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Mathieu Malaterre:
>
>> I am trying to compile VTK using gcj and I am getting those compiler
>> error, could someone please let me know if the code is legal (should
>> compile) or not:
>
> This is legal per Sun's JNI specficiation: jboolean and jbyte are
> distinct types because there signedness differs:
>
> <http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/jni/spec/types.html#wp198>
>
> It's a bug in GCC.
I didn't see the original message to which this is replying. If you can
make a test case I'll see if the bug can be fixed.
Andrew.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
2009-07-19 7:52 ` Andrew Haley
@ 2009-07-19 8:17 ` Florian Weimer
2009-07-19 15:17 ` Andrew Haley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Florian Weimer @ 2009-07-19 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Haley; +Cc: Mathieu Malaterre, java
* Andrew Haley:
> On 07/19/2009 07:02 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Mathieu Malaterre:
>>
>>> I am trying to compile VTK using gcj and I am getting those compiler
>>> error, could someone please let me know if the code is legal (should
>>> compile) or not:
>>
>> This is legal per Sun's JNI specficiation: jboolean and jbyte are
>> distinct types because there signedness differs:
>>
>> <http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/jni/spec/types.html#wp198>
>>
>> It's a bug in GCC.
>
> I didn't see the original message to which this is replying.
It's about C++ code which contains a function overloaded on jbyte and
jboolean. This fails with GCJ because they are typedef'ed to the same
type.
> If you can make a test case I'll see if the bug can be fixed.
Compare the table I referenced with these pieces from jni_md.h:
| typedef int jbyte __attribute__((__mode__(__QI__)));
| typedef int jshort __attribute__((__mode__(__HI__)));
| typedef int jint __attribute__((__mode__(__SI__)));
| typedef int jlong __attribute__((__mode__(__DI__)));
| typedef int jboolean __attribute__((__mode__(__QI__)));
| typedef unsigned short jchar __attribute__((__mode__(__HI__)));
| typedef float jfloat;
| typedef double jdouble;
| typedef jint jsize;
| typedef int8_t jbyte;
| typedef int16_t jshort;
| typedef int32_t jint;
| typedef int64_t jlong;
| typedef float jfloat;
| typedef double jdouble;
| typedef jint jsize;
| typedef int8_t jboolean;
| typedef uint16_t jchar;
jboolean is signed, but Sun's spec says it should be unsigned.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
2009-07-19 8:17 ` Florian Weimer
@ 2009-07-19 15:17 ` Andrew Haley
2009-07-19 18:53 ` Florian Weimer
2009-07-21 7:17 ` Mathieu Malaterre
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Haley @ 2009-07-19 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Weimer; +Cc: Mathieu Malaterre, java
On 07/19/2009 09:17 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Andrew Haley:
>
>> On 07/19/2009 07:02 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> * Mathieu Malaterre:
>>>
>>>> I am trying to compile VTK using gcj and I am getting those compiler
>>>> error, could someone please let me know if the code is legal (should
>>>> compile) or not:
>>> This is legal per Sun's JNI specficiation: jboolean and jbyte are
>>> distinct types because there signedness differs:
>>>
>>> <http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/jni/spec/types.html#wp198>
>>>
>>> It's a bug in GCC.
>> I didn't see the original message to which this is replying.
>
> It's about C++ code which contains a function overloaded on jbyte and
> jboolean. This fails with GCJ because they are typedef'ed to the same
> type.
>
>> If you can make a test case I'll see if the bug can be fixed.
>
> Compare the table I referenced with these pieces from jni_md.h:
>
> | typedef int jbyte __attribute__((__mode__(__QI__)));
> | typedef int jshort __attribute__((__mode__(__HI__)));
> | typedef int jint __attribute__((__mode__(__SI__)));
> | typedef int jlong __attribute__((__mode__(__DI__)));
> | typedef int jboolean __attribute__((__mode__(__QI__)));
> | typedef unsigned short jchar __attribute__((__mode__(__HI__)));
> | typedef float jfloat;
> | typedef double jdouble;
> | typedef jint jsize;
>
> | typedef int8_t jbyte;
> | typedef int16_t jshort;
> | typedef int32_t jint;
> | typedef int64_t jlong;
> | typedef float jfloat;
> | typedef double jdouble;
> | typedef jint jsize;
> | typedef int8_t jboolean;
> | typedef uint16_t jchar;
>
> jboolean is signed, but Sun's spec says it should be unsigned.
OK. I can fix it, but it's an ABI-incompatible change. There's no
way this fix could be applied to any existing releases, only gcc
4.5.
Andrew.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
2009-07-19 15:17 ` Andrew Haley
@ 2009-07-19 18:53 ` Florian Weimer
2009-07-20 8:17 ` Andrew Haley
2009-07-21 7:17 ` Mathieu Malaterre
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Florian Weimer @ 2009-07-19 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Haley; +Cc: Mathieu Malaterre, java
* Andrew Haley:
> OK. I can fix it, but it's an ABI-incompatible change.
Yes, I know.
> There's no way this fix could be applied to any existing releases,
> only gcc 4.5.
Right. I still think it's a bug which should be fixed. It's also
easy to pick up GCC's <jni.h> when compiling for OpenJDK, so it's not
just GCJ which is affected by this.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
2009-07-19 18:53 ` Florian Weimer
@ 2009-07-20 8:17 ` Andrew Haley
2009-07-20 8:28 ` Florian Weimer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Haley @ 2009-07-20 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Weimer; +Cc: Mathieu Malaterre, java
On 07/19/2009 07:53 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Andrew Haley:
>
>> OK. I can fix it, but it's an ABI-incompatible change.
>
> Yes, I know.
>
>> There's no way this fix could be applied to any existing releases,
>> only gcc 4.5.
>
> Right. I still think it's a bug which should be fixed. It's also
> easy to pick up GCC's <jni.h> when compiling for OpenJDK, so it's not
> just GCJ which is affected by this.
Well, it mostly is, since JNI code is mostly written in C. I suppose
that's why this has never been noticed before.
Andrew.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
2009-07-20 8:17 ` Andrew Haley
@ 2009-07-20 8:28 ` Florian Weimer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Florian Weimer @ 2009-07-20 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Haley; +Cc: Mathieu Malaterre, java
* Andrew Haley:
>> Right. I still think it's a bug which should be fixed. It's also
>> easy to pick up GCC's <jni.h> when compiling for OpenJDK, so it's not
>> just GCJ which is affected by this.
>
> Well, it mostly is, since JNI code is mostly written in C.
Not sure about this.
> I suppose that's why this has never been noticed before.
javah generats an extern "C" wrapper for the prototypes, so you're
still ABI-compatible to the JNI interface even if you use C++.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
2009-07-19 15:17 ` Andrew Haley
2009-07-19 18:53 ` Florian Weimer
@ 2009-07-21 7:17 ` Mathieu Malaterre
2009-07-21 7:49 ` Andrew Haley
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Malaterre @ 2009-07-21 7:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Haley; +Cc: Florian Weimer, java
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Andrew Haley<aph@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/19/2009 09:17 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Andrew Haley:
>>
>>> On 07/19/2009 07:02 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>>> * Mathieu Malaterre:
>>>>
>>>>> I am trying to compile VTK using gcj and I am getting those compiler
>>>>> error, could someone please let me know if the code is legal (should
>>>>> compile) or not:
>>>> This is legal per Sun's JNI specficiation: jboolean and jbyte are
>>>> distinct types because there signedness differs:
>>>>
>>>> <http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/jni/spec/types.html#wp198>
>>>>
>>>> It's a bug in GCC.
>>> I didn't see the original message to which this is replying.
>>
>> It's about C++ code which contains a function overloaded on jbyte and
>> jboolean. This fails with GCJ because they are typedef'ed to the same
>> type.
>>
>>> If you can make a test case I'll see if the bug can be fixed.
>>
>> Compare the table I referenced with these pieces from jni_md.h:
>>
>> | typedef int jbyte __attribute__((__mode__(__QI__)));
>> | typedef int jshort __attribute__((__mode__(__HI__)));
>> | typedef int jint __attribute__((__mode__(__SI__)));
>> | typedef int jlong __attribute__((__mode__(__DI__)));
>> | typedef int jboolean __attribute__((__mode__(__QI__)));
>> | typedef unsigned short jchar __attribute__((__mode__(__HI__)));
>> | typedef float jfloat;
>> | typedef double jdouble;
>> | typedef jint jsize;
>>
>> | typedef int8_t jbyte;
>> | typedef int16_t jshort;
>> | typedef int32_t jint;
>> | typedef int64_t jlong;
>> | typedef float jfloat;
>> | typedef double jdouble;
>> | typedef jint jsize;
>> | typedef int8_t jboolean;
>> | typedef uint16_t jchar;
>>
>> jboolean is signed, but Sun's spec says it should be unsigned.
>
> OK. I can fix it, but it's an ABI-incompatible change. There's no
> way this fix could be applied to any existing releases, only gcc
> 4.5.
Excellent ! Is there a bug entry so I can follow the process ?
Thanks,
--
Mathieu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
2009-07-21 7:17 ` Mathieu Malaterre
@ 2009-07-21 7:49 ` Andrew Haley
2009-07-21 8:45 ` Mathieu Malaterre
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Haley @ 2009-07-21 7:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mathieu Malaterre; +Cc: Florian Weimer, java
On 07/21/2009 08:16 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Andrew Haley<aph@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 07/19/2009 09:17 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> * Andrew Haley:
>>>
>>>> On 07/19/2009 07:02 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>>>> * Mathieu Malaterre:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I am trying to compile VTK using gcj and I am getting those compiler
>>>>>> error, could someone please let me know if the code is legal (should
>>>>>> compile) or not:
>>>>> This is legal per Sun's JNI specficiation: jboolean and jbyte are
>>>>> distinct types because there signedness differs:
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/jni/spec/types.html#wp198>
>>>>>
>>>>> It's a bug in GCC.
>>>> I didn't see the original message to which this is replying.
>>> It's about C++ code which contains a function overloaded on jbyte and
>>> jboolean. This fails with GCJ because they are typedef'ed to the same
>>> type.
>>>
>>>> If you can make a test case I'll see if the bug can be fixed.
>>> Compare the table I referenced with these pieces from jni_md.h:
>>>
>>> | typedef int jbyte __attribute__((__mode__(__QI__)));
>>> | typedef int jshort __attribute__((__mode__(__HI__)));
>>> | typedef int jint __attribute__((__mode__(__SI__)));
>>> | typedef int jlong __attribute__((__mode__(__DI__)));
>>> | typedef int jboolean __attribute__((__mode__(__QI__)));
>>> | typedef unsigned short jchar __attribute__((__mode__(__HI__)));
>>> | typedef float jfloat;
>>> | typedef double jdouble;
>>> | typedef jint jsize;
>>>
>>> | typedef int8_t jbyte;
>>> | typedef int16_t jshort;
>>> | typedef int32_t jint;
>>> | typedef int64_t jlong;
>>> | typedef float jfloat;
>>> | typedef double jdouble;
>>> | typedef jint jsize;
>>> | typedef int8_t jboolean;
>>> | typedef uint16_t jchar;
>>>
>>> jboolean is signed, but Sun's spec says it should be unsigned.
>> OK. I can fix it, but it's an ABI-incompatible change. There's no
>> way this fix could be applied to any existing releases, only gcc
>> 4.5.
>
> Excellent ! Is there a bug entry so I can follow the process ?
Not until you make one.
Andrew.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
2009-07-21 7:49 ` Andrew Haley
@ 2009-07-21 8:45 ` Mathieu Malaterre
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Malaterre @ 2009-07-21 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Haley; +Cc: Florian Weimer, java
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Andrew Haley<aph@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/21/2009 08:16 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Andrew Haley<aph@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On 07/19/2009 09:17 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>>> * Andrew Haley:
>>>>
>>>>> On 07/19/2009 07:02 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>>>>> * Mathieu Malaterre:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am trying to compile VTK using gcj and I am getting those compiler
>>>>>>> error, could someone please let me know if the code is legal (should
>>>>>>> compile) or not:
>>>>>> This is legal per Sun's JNI specficiation: jboolean and jbyte are
>>>>>> distinct types because there signedness differs:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/jni/spec/types.html#wp198>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's a bug in GCC.
>>>>> I didn't see the original message to which this is replying.
>>>> It's about C++ code which contains a function overloaded on jbyte and
>>>> jboolean. This fails with GCJ because they are typedef'ed to the same
>>>> type.
>>>>
>>>>> If you can make a test case I'll see if the bug can be fixed.
>>>> Compare the table I referenced with these pieces from jni_md.h:
>>>>
>>>> | typedef int jbyte __attribute__((__mode__(__QI__)));
>>>> | typedef int jshort __attribute__((__mode__(__HI__)));
>>>> | typedef int jint __attribute__((__mode__(__SI__)));
>>>> | typedef int jlong __attribute__((__mode__(__DI__)));
>>>> | typedef int jboolean __attribute__((__mode__(__QI__)));
>>>> | typedef unsigned short jchar __attribute__((__mode__(__HI__)));
>>>> | typedef float jfloat;
>>>> | typedef double jdouble;
>>>> | typedef jint jsize;
>>>>
>>>> | typedef int8_t jbyte;
>>>> | typedef int16_t jshort;
>>>> | typedef int32_t jint;
>>>> | typedef int64_t jlong;
>>>> | typedef float jfloat;
>>>> | typedef double jdouble;
>>>> | typedef jint jsize;
>>>> | typedef int8_t jboolean;
>>>> | typedef uint16_t jchar;
>>>>
>>>> jboolean is signed, but Sun's spec says it should be unsigned.
>>> OK. I can fix it, but it's an ABI-incompatible change. There's no
>>> way this fix could be applied to any existing releases, only gcc
>>> 4.5.
>>
>> Excellent ! Is there a bug entry so I can follow the process ?
>
> Not until you make one.
Done:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40816
--
Mathieu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-07-21 8:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-07-16 12:38 error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded Mathieu Malaterre
2009-07-19 6:02 ` Florian Weimer
2009-07-19 7:52 ` Andrew Haley
2009-07-19 8:17 ` Florian Weimer
2009-07-19 15:17 ` Andrew Haley
2009-07-19 18:53 ` Florian Weimer
2009-07-20 8:17 ` Andrew Haley
2009-07-20 8:28 ` Florian Weimer
2009-07-21 7:17 ` Mathieu Malaterre
2009-07-21 7:49 ` Andrew Haley
2009-07-21 8:45 ` Mathieu Malaterre
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).