From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31028 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2015 19:16:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jit-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Sender: jit-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31010 invoked by uid 89); 4 Feb 2015 19:16:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Checked: by ClamAV 0.98.5 on sourceware.org X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on sourceware.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Message-ID: <1423077032.29180.125.camel@surprise> Subject: Re: [PATCH] More fixes for update_web_docs_svn for jit docs (PR jit/64257) From: David Malcolm To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: jit@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Jeff Law Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1423074736-47636-1-git-send-email-dmalcolm@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.26 X-SW-Source: 2015-q1/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 19:47 +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Wednesday 2015-02-04 13:32, David Malcolm wrote: > > OK for trunk? > > > > gcc/jit/ChangeLog: > > PR jit/64257 > > * docs/conf.py (html_theme): Change from 'pyramid' > > to 'sphinxdoc'. > > > > maintainer-scripts/ChangeLog: > > PR jit/64257 > > * update_web_docs_svn: Update build of jit docs to use EPEL6 > > variant install of sphinx 1.0.8, rather than 0.6.6. > > Yes. > > > +# python-sphinx10 package. The latter installs its executable as: > > Here I'd omit the colon, but that is more of a stylistic question > I guess. Thanks. I've committed it to svn trunk as r220412, omitting the colon. Gerald: Please can you do the "svn up" on the relevant machine again, so that it gets the updated "update_web_docs_svn"? Hopefully this will fix the cronjob... Dave