From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 64429 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2019 17:19:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jit-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Sender: jit-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 63865 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jan 2019 17:19:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Checked: by ClamAV 0.100.2 on sourceware.org X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=day X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on sourceware.org X-Spam-Level: X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 17:19:08 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCD387D0DA; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 17:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ovpn-116-42.phx2.redhat.com (ovpn-116-42.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.42]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C385600C8; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 17:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1547054345.7788.134.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: about header file parsing From: David Malcolm To: akrl Cc: jit@gcc.gnu.org Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Wed, 09 Jan 2019 17:19:06 +0000 (UTC) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-q1/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 17:15 +0000, akrl wrote: [...] > > > > > > Would be this something that is upstreamable in some form? > > > > Maybe eventually, but given that libgccjit is part of gcc and thus > > has > > a one-year release cycle, it feels like something that would best > > be a > > 3rd-party project for now. > > > > Any takers? (my day job is bug-fixing gcc 9 right now) > > > > Dave > > > > Okay I'll try to put some mostly weekend time on it. > I'll come up with something and I'll let you guys know. > Feel free if you have suggestions. Excellent! Thanks. Dave > Bests > > Andrea > > -- > akrl@sdf.org