From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 638 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2014 05:16:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jit-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Sender: jit-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 610 invoked by uid 89); 31 Oct 2014 05:16:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Checked: by ClamAV 0.98.4 on sourceware.org X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on sourceware.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Message-ID: <54531B33.5030609@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 00:00:00 -0000 From: Jeff Law User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Joseph S. Myers" , David Malcolm CC: jit@gcc.gnu.org, "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] Heart of the JIT implementation References: <1413222308-25753-1-git-send-email-dmalcolm@redhat.com> <1413299342.9513.50.camel@surprise> <1413299604.9513.53.camel@surprise> <1414695171.29411.16.camel@surprise> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23 X-SW-Source: 2014-q4/txt/msg00064.txt.bz2 On 10/30/14 18:50, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > I don't see it as a blocker, but I would not be surprised if having the > libraries statically linked into libgccjit.so causes problems (is it safe > to have two completely separate copies of libstdc++ in the same process? > I don't know.). Jason, Jakub, Aldy, Ben & others looked at this a few years ago for Red Hat and our conclusion was that having separate copies of libstdc++ in the same process might work sometimes, but ultimately wasn't anything we would be willing to stand behind and support at any level. jeff