From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11583 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2015 18:19:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jit-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Sender: jit-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11559 invoked by uid 89); 11 Jul 2015 18:19:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Checked: by ClamAV 0.98.7 on sourceware.org X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on sourceware.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Message-ID: <55A15E39.7000906@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Law , Armin Rigo , David Malcolm CC: Basile Starynkevitch , jit@gcc.gnu.org, GCC Development Subject: Re: GCC/JIT and precise garbage collection support? References: <559EF2F1.6000000@starynkevitch.net> <1436493224.31573.32.camel@surprise> <1436537517.31573.48.camel@surprise> <55A01062.8000301@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <55A01062.8000301@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.27 X-SW-Source: 2015-q3/txt/msg00083.txt.bz2 On 07/10/2015 07:35 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > I wonder how much overlap there is between this need and what we're > going to need to do for resumable functions which are being discussed in > the ISO C++ standards meetings. A considerable amount, I'll be bound. Andrew.