From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 79892 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2016 21:39:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jit-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Sender: jit-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 79869 invoked by uid 89); 14 Oct 2016 21:39:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Checked: by ClamAV 0.99.2 on sourceware.org X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=starters, Hx-languages-length:553, website, our X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on sourceware.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Subject: Re: [wwwdocs, coding conventions] Mention OVERRIDE/FINAL To: David Malcolm , Bernd Schmidt , Trevor Saunders References: <1462552846-17096-1-git-send-email-dmalcolm@redhat.com> <8ce94f18-421f-9466-85cf-e17d9caee151@redhat.com> <20160506183345.GK3628@ball> <5b2de202-c6bd-f8fc-3407-45a40ddfe62c@redhat.com> <014f88ec-909b-db46-1213-e9dbb8f14ee4@redhat.com> <0c78b409-efcc-3c49-4323-699e7ecfb6a0@redhat.com> <1476480483.10766.46.camel@redhat.com> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, jit@gcc.gnu.org, Gerald Pfeifer From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <89056a6e-a3a1-ddaf-c606-d80da91d6463@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1476480483.10766.46.camel@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.26 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Fri, 14 Oct 2016 21:38:49 +0000 (UTC) X-SW-Source: 2016-q4/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2 On 10/14/2016 10:28 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > I propose that we update our coding conventions to mention the OVERRIDE > and FINAL macros in the paragraph that discusses virtual funcs. > > The attached patch (to the website) does so. > Good idea, I like it. GDB is following GCC's C++ coding conventions, BTW: https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/Internals%20GDB-C-Coding-Standards#C.2B-.2B--specific_coding_conventions At least for starters. :-) Let's see how that goes. Thanks, Pedro Alves