public inbox for jit@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guillaume Gomez <guillaume1.gomez@gmail.com>
To: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
Cc: Antoni Boucher <bouanto@zoho.com>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, jit@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libgccjit: Add support for `restrict` attribute on function parameters
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 17:35:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAOQCfTJUPgmD_5iM1La+GGG2U-sgfAxjHNzYvBWF-6GcqqgBg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a604e83bb8b06d011f6e55cf2c2c236a31aa296c.camel@redhat.com>

Thanks a lot!

Le mar. 29 août 2023 à 17:35, David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com> a écrit :
>
> On Tue, 2023-08-29 at 17:15 +0200, Guillaume Gomez wrote:
> > We finished the investigation and found out the issue: when passing
> > arguments by value to functions, rustc still provides "NoAlias" as
> > attribute to the argument whereas it should never be passed in this
> > case. Luckily for us, in case the argument is a function pointer
> > coming from a struct field, it crashes GCC, which is what allowed us
> > to figure out about this. A code which reproduces this bug:
>
> [...snip...]
>
> > So in short: the patch in the previous mail which added this check:
> >
> > ```
> > RETURN_NULL_IF_FAIL (type->is_pointer (), NULL, NULL, "not a pointer
> > type");
> > ```
> >
> > is correct and ready.
>
> Thanks.  I've gone ahead and pushed it to gcc trunk for you as r14-
> 3552-g29763b002459cb.
>
> [...snip...]
>
> Dave
>

      reply	other threads:[~2023-08-29 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-16 16:32 Guillaume Gomez
2023-08-16 20:06 ` Guillaume Gomez
2023-08-16 23:06   ` David Malcolm
2023-08-17  9:30     ` Guillaume Gomez
2023-08-17 15:26       ` Guillaume Gomez
2023-08-17 15:41         ` Guillaume Gomez
2023-08-17 15:50           ` David Malcolm
2023-08-17 15:59             ` Guillaume Gomez
2023-08-17 18:09               ` Guillaume Gomez
2023-08-22 15:26                 ` Antoni Boucher
2023-08-25 20:47                   ` Guillaume Gomez
2023-08-29 15:15                     ` Guillaume Gomez
2023-08-29 15:34                       ` David Malcolm
2023-08-29 15:35                         ` Guillaume Gomez [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAAOQCfTJUPgmD_5iM1La+GGG2U-sgfAxjHNzYvBWF-6GcqqgBg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=guillaume1.gomez@gmail.com \
    --cc=bouanto@zoho.com \
    --cc=dmalcolm@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jit@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).