From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jit-return-582-listarch-jit=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3767 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2015 21:50:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact jit-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:jit@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jit-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:jit-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: jit-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3750 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jun 2015 21:50:30 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Checked: by ClamAV 0.98.7 on sourceware.org
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on sourceware.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-HELO: mail-yh0-f53.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=WabhZ8jyuB/JfD0MwYJVzBelLVS3XwH67rKZzArVlCg=;
        b=W1uyHtxUEkhfOx/WklcENrRJdvxSy7taxBJMitrBze7uXyR7zS4iqsEigzXirYgjMZ
         sYtj0j9iUxDrNo28xumMtWFOJwIVRSnIYWk/qyp3cuuZC3YkkLcx/p1i4+lEwrAQ1Uly
         /HxT7/XEQ5tf8hH5HMhV6cgvDOdBdcVn3aHTWOjblxg33a7X1sDXHoDaS8p1zhDfKqE3
         sSfCVciSzXEctF43VATgf/TArZj64IuuNLyU2P7KC+Fgr/o2hUvsAeixShMmOLPk1iHD
         tFoWcxwQJYmc+iaZtJS1RLvD+QZBFIv+cWjY/uu76cVhcMuAoLzuwXaODs7CpwZK2n4x
         +6Hw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkGZt1YRO3cnbBLRZEiGI22dYtpO+y63Fru+TcFeLZQh4ys2PgKsH20ZX7LaH9tr2/1OMH1
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.170.56.78 with SMTP id 75mr27750293yky.109.1433886626977;
 Tue, 09 Jun 2015 14:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACXZuxeUj=-tWWqEWWNRDm6=DSxCoRa1m2UO7DbvKhYTLCvoYA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACXZuxeUj=-tWWqEWWNRDm6=DSxCoRa1m2UO7DbvKhYTLCvoYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CACXZuxc5HWK5zWN+ih9ob21HkLZK5eh98dG+ajEVuFf-n91fqg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Does libgccjit support union definitions?
From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@majumdar.org.uk>
To: jit@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2015-q2/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2

On 9 June 2015 at 22:33, Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@majumdar.org.uk> wrote:
> LLVM does not support unions - so one has to use structs and casts
> etc. Does libgccjit support union types?
>

I see that there is an API to create a union type, although this is
not described in the online docs. So in general are the online docs
kept up to date or should I just refer to the header file?

Regards