From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jit-return-835-listarch-jit=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 45236 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2015 19:41:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact jit-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:jit@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jit-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:jit-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: jit-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 45225 invoked by uid 89); 5 Aug 2015 19:41:45 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Checked: by ClamAV 0.98.7 on sourceware.org
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on sourceware.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-HELO: mail-yk0-f171.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=kIYRpx+I6OEl/Eo7+cdBJB/Z2EUErD4DjJASVNBJquQ=;
        b=ObS9t6eGfdKleOPxTh63AEce8jgp29885fi37P8VhBelsRk60QqeDrdNNxdI0DqLr5
         3DTLakrtxBtCZ5Y1LaAghhJ7I5IawzPPxuzmCeLJLE3co6ZEe57np7WUlqTVmY7zt7LS
         yayNxOes+6dJSrz+qmbmJX/wGCN8EjkYR8eacZdo5xtQ813gBZYwbz9h+6ebVArKJHE/
         PdR+XywC5URC88AaXf/avCxW1Sej0T8BNiy75QuGLwg8nrVSmS5YEW8i1EikmszJpPsk
         MMcizxLW6YrJvVaveYezTuIeaUMhZE/7b4cnrbGEdhn6Bznu9D5mrhDZ3JPXRb3h4evY
         3yvg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnUx1p62JFz2pb8lyWZzx6RVXtpkK7IzmMIROpo+kQjlB23O0l0agYLcrnXu/5pJT45ABTa
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.13.204.130 with SMTP id o124mr11245890ywd.171.1438803702068;
 Wed, 05 Aug 2015 12:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1438647513.21752.13.camel@surprise>
References: <CACXZuxf3E+TcL1BQSoSHQJeQm2=o9-Pww+pNuVoxAQq97iXQAA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1438028999.15571.92.camel@surprise>
	<55B6AEAE.9030806@starynkevitch.net>
	<CACXZuxe0tOkjYEcjpyf23Hzj=DU3OVDDCkh9GU6ZZ_7W9Gj5_w@mail.gmail.com>
	<1438647513.21752.13.camel@surprise>
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CACXZuxdwXd11Ap63r9RYCujAm2EqxxFqptmbCzzi2c5HQE5=ug@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: JIT compilation speed
From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@majumdar.org.uk>
To: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
Cc: Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch.net>, jit@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2015-q3/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2

On 4 August 2015 at 01:18, David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com> wrote:
> FWIW, the timer patch:
>  https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg02715.html
> is now in trunk (r226530).
>
> So if you're using trunk, you should be able to:
>
>   /* One-time initialization. */
>   gcc_jit_timer *timer = gcc_jit_timer_new ();
>
>
>
>   /* For all of your contexts, have them all use the
>      same shared timer:  */
>   gcc_jit_context_set_timer (ctxt, timer);
>
>
>
>   /* On shutdown, print the accumulated timings.  */
>   gcc_jit_timer_print (timer, stderr);
>   gcc_jit_timer_release (timer);
>
> to get a profile on stderr of where all that time is being spent.
>

Thanks Dave. I am currently tied up with nailing down an elusive bug
in Ravi - and have not had time to look at libgccjit related work. But
I hope to get back to it soon. Will keep you posted.

Regards
Dibyendu