From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jit-return-593-listarch-jit=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1660 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2015 20:25:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact jit-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:jit@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jit-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:jit-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: jit-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1645 invoked by uid 89); 13 Jun 2015 20:25:57 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Checked: by ClamAV 0.98.7 on sourceware.org
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on sourceware.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-HELO: mail-yh0-f43.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=ozsd/lRM6hDeHeARTOdZWVzNC+HcsuOowcd2RK9aPNU=;
        b=DcDJm6/BWagZw+Ax1rJv88dLvTx9TcCNU+Ef4/h7VZqagEOIQ0NYhuMYpTJWZ79+nQ
         xlazaMLAKdEAQ3mibarIzvKyjzQT9IR6WvxxYrhXE71vIvArYWKE6srYz1HWvpQIc7S0
         r/UiiExH1q/KxqWE2byjPGTVpeeqlTj6tsEBGdTGphLuQpqBpt5Dy+RL5M4SahmMAxlQ
         y/A2A8Ef4ZvTC63Jj/YA1wvKmUAcvkXiDl4xhLYdmww8EMgygy+rpspEUzoIm/9SeGlS
         EISDVcMnjWf2kSyksZ6MrugDVFeVEHj81PrstK8Z/dkEasHdHKYa5/Oz+VoSBvhY0ZuQ
         jYVQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlQ39sYzK6PS5iGuMNdE2Zz/EVx66vqJwpfv4DZdTC9fJG/r2CMRQCUoe/JmNzqdE0Z7+5j
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.170.39.210 with SMTP id 201mr26189653ykh.29.1434227153586;
 Sat, 13 Jun 2015 13:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1434054685.12727.205.camel@surprise>
References: <CACXZuxe2GDhN+cPdG4jopq11ZibU6qW5pL==AgahNbEJB1vwoA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1434054685.12727.205.camel@surprise>
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CACXZuxesvD+4s8KmhjC1G4t9cSYVD0Kzna1hSxhhsBcwnALnwg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Basic blocks, jump targets and locals
From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@majumdar.org.uk>
To: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
Cc: jit@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2015-q2/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2

On 11 June 2015 at 21:31, David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com> wrote:
> Local variables in libgccjit are local to a *function*; there's no
> association between them and blocks.  Blocks in libgccjit relate to
> control flow, not to scope.
>
> Note that any initialization of a local variable has to be done
> explicitly, by adding an assignment statement.  Typically that
> assignment statement would be added to the initial block, as in the
> example above (so I suppose that's an association of sorts between
> locals and the entry block).
>

Can an assignment statement be added to a block that is already terminated?

Regards
Dibyendu