From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 418 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2015 21:21:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jit-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Sender: jit-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 382 invoked by uid 89); 4 Feb 2015 21:21:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Checked: by ClamAV 0.98.5 on sourceware.org X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on sourceware.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: ainaz.pair.com Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: David Malcolm cc: jit@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Jeff Law Subject: Re: [PATCH] More fixes for update_web_docs_svn for jit docs (PR jit/64257) In-Reply-To: <1423077032.29180.125.camel@surprise> Message-ID: References: <1423074736-47636-1-git-send-email-dmalcolm@redhat.com> <1423077032.29180.125.camel@surprise> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2015-q1/txt/msg00061.txt.bz2 On Wednesday 2015-02-04 14:10, David Malcolm wrote: > Gerald: Please can you do the "svn up" on the relevant machine again, > so that it gets the updated "update_web_docs_svn"? That was my plan, yes. :-) I just did that and manually ran the script, and it seems to work. Still, do you think you can add a bit of error handling such that an issue like the one we had (cf. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gccadmin/2015-q1/msg00077.html ) does not kill the entire script? A bit of resilience would be good. Gerald