From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B8F33858406 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 00:53:46 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 5B8F33858406 Received: from mail-qv1-f70.google.com (mail-qv1-f70.google.com [209.85.219.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-437-TLUrISFWMxCX-CgTQgpS8w-1; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 19:53:44 -0500 X-MC-Unique: TLUrISFWMxCX-CgTQgpS8w-1 Received: by mail-qv1-f70.google.com with SMTP id fw10-20020a056214238a00b003c05d328ad2so10492602qvb.2 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 16:53:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BdjVtGkVtj5jaoG/bvp2m5XOPmjANOJayxL7vuMM7tk=; b=2SSW06GNLma5Lw/7zVpR0ptrl+xpNnz7IxCtsFPa6hS2StSeUENOwfLJJU0Niw2ROq jKsYd9YWpPsJYb50yMERcNWHjxB2uzfsmbigtaKp37kWZg992maIT7YNNKm7vZ7H8nii 78/uHjWLJzsGFipAC+CdaLpHUdiiOnI8qlaHw6S/2089FU9DLjDe8l71s/jj6u5cnOS0 sYdjd1BP1J6KIdOcPvNHMoCEX17SeDZumRBHvJydZfaeBF8SUZBMdHsq6X1uWD+HncmS kBkQ+2kHQJwd3gEEFOonpPqXDEH7tPCppVFOi1cB4uLBg0o+GoMv+3jU9BNT6rH1A1KV UgqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533hF3Z48/hwoyXwyGv63vSxOcU7feNcUXTGVLBIjpJV1TKcjuqV Vww6fOuEMqjz9rENsTFzboX/fB8UJOaLW9CCtjZSwIS4kHxUiJj0oFHsy8VBRG14BvXzDcz7hAB jma8iAoY= X-Received: by 2002:a37:745:: with SMTP id 66mr31925584qkh.11.1637369624349; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 16:53:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwxb/kgkUtJBDW4eZP5XFWISy7BLP0EpdcAKr61UAZ71DhBBXwUkeMFhf2DY7Zm88vPDXmK7g== X-Received: by 2002:a37:745:: with SMTP id 66mr31925574qkh.11.1637369624163; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 16:53:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from t14s.localdomain (c-73-69-212-193.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.69.212.193]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v15sm777724qkl.91.2021.11.19.16.53.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 19 Nov 2021 16:53:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] libgccjit: add some reflection functions in the jit C api From: David Malcolm To: Antoni Boucher Cc: Antoni Boucher via Jit , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 19:53:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <20200902010120.crnx55ev635ceiey@bouanto-desktop.localdomain> <6fe2ea355403eb177c9632e076c11c792f23c791.camel@redhat.com> <9cd00fe5cb5c03184e3a5bd939447b30450a8ca7.camel@redhat.com> <20201015160226.cka4iq3w22jztopm@bouanto-desktop.localdomain> <20201015173952.ft7mu5ajbaxb3gke@bouanto-desktop.localdomain> <54ba5c58dbd2b8c7b1f3276c2b87cddf55e258bd.camel@redhat.com> <20201103221324.xw3jbvrw2uwdc4rz@bouanto-desktop.localdomain> <3388bb8c84e68cd7b0698dc154e7a5666c0d2cde.camel@redhat.com> <0e8b6450bcb23182b85342d8010c3bea0c297ba2.camel@zoho.com> <534254132a841b75d555a52ce952f84418f168c2.camel@redhat.com> <3c328b40570b10b22a8925fd64b2781dc9264358.camel@zoho.com> <715f6ebfe1627fc39d8ec3b15f1e38f8378f3db7.camel@redhat.com> <711092bc80237e32caa48f2060c93be30cb9c220.camel@zoho.com> User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.4 (3.38.4-1.fc33) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: jit@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Jit mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 00:53:47 -0000 On Mon, 2021-09-27 at 20:53 -0400, Antoni Boucher wrote: > I fixed an issue (it would show an error message when > gcc_jit_type_dyncast_function_ptr_type was called on a type different > than a function pointer type). > > Here's the updated patch. Sorry about the delay in responding. The updated patch is good for trunk, assuming you re-ran the regression tests successfully. Dave