From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98D8F3858C54 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 21:59:13 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 98D8F3858C54 Received: from mail-qt1-f200.google.com (mail-qt1-f200.google.com [209.85.160.200]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-434-X0SvAtc_PbacH6azBWwS6Q-1; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 17:59:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: X0SvAtc_PbacH6azBWwS6Q-1 Received: by mail-qt1-f200.google.com with SMTP id k1-20020ac85fc1000000b002e1c5930386so101762qta.3 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 14:59:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3Walls0oQEn7mUuhC39+SdbhJZEkmQEpMtw41PqYcDg=; b=bOA6VDbr/cNW3YLqaEXo2ixBTP/ntlLjHjIV/fUNSwifYnwtSj+oFY5dKRjXAOtYqc NMKhNRKvyaszUwQ1k4nWmIqSG3yAdW/nuNjJW5iKnAES9u07g84Dd4M3ZExRaq15kXT9 DZjyW0dM4tQp6PtjeAzNHcULtJP2asoEb3dmTDg4UgV+c+G6VQV7br3bGhkafIdwBoHw TU55hzZvuGEVWe2z8+6RMCMod/xXGK97s/v7lZUh6hMGgefi7q4KUSUWrmk7yUMlSzD4 3aFdAWpgQCJFNXP+9Hw5KaX3YscTOrIbIhp0l/agPhNvwvTXI0eT/5hsTkSEjnfbjJLK 5RdA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532JTXDfYGWP/OJdjkN5hP0emnjpofiSyav6tkESUYRPl/YU3ZwX tCxereA8Anj1lnqMnZa1pXnMc903MjTJQTmQvi8peVwiICkPVyijDJoj9TrtwMSWIXpwxfqN2TD Nwj18g6M= X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:387:b0:2e2:277e:72a1 with SMTP id j7-20020a05622a038700b002e2277e72a1mr5017851qtx.658.1649800751689; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 14:59:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzhdlb12Y0TmJ0TDDBXMtbvkNfkB6Q+6gHz6+P5IiB/QbeupVAPEZXFbqkc7v+xbF8PKQQ/UA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:387:b0:2e2:277e:72a1 with SMTP id j7-20020a05622a038700b002e2277e72a1mr5017841qtx.658.1649800751501; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 14:59:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from t14s.localdomain (c-73-69-212-193.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.69.212.193]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s3-20020a05622a1a8300b002f15bb78651sm900319qtc.38.2022.04.12.14.59.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 12 Apr 2022 14:59:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: rustc_codegen_gcc and libgccjit for GCC 12 ? From: David Malcolm To: Antoni Boucher , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, jit@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Biener , jakub@redhat.com Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 17:59:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <977a1abd031f63b14685feb552e679c39e7d1013.camel@redhat.com> References: <4e768a1ee7492627c88a06c4c3d168d7dca95840.camel@redhat.com> <9fd67350bbfa7b8a5acf16c9c6fa1f57757d6ca9.camel@zoho.com> <977a1abd031f63b14685feb552e679c39e7d1013.camel@redhat.com> User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.4 (3.38.4-1.fc33) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: jit@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Jit mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 21:59:14 -0000 On Mon, 2022-04-11 at 19:56 -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 16:37 -0400, Antoni Boucher wrote: > > On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 15:36 -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > > [...snip...] > > > > > > > > > So I think I'm waiting on an updated version of the sized- > > > integer- > > > types > > > patch, and some nit-fixes for the other patches (but am > > > disappearing > > > on > > > vacation on 18th - 22nd). > > > > I'll update the patches to address your review over the weekend. > > Thanks! > > Thanks. > > I've been working through them today, fixing things up so they commit > cleanly, and fixing a few more nits, but it's clear I'm not going to > be > done tonight. > > I hope to push the 5 jit patches to trunk for GCC 12 tomorrow > (assuming > my tests pass). I've now pushed the 5 jit patches to trunk for GCC 12, as r12-8116-gaf80ea97b61847 through: r12-8120-g6e5ad1cc24a315 after successful bootstrap and regression testing on x86_64-pc-linux- gnu; see various other recent mails to the gcc-patches/jit mailing lists for the details of the specific patches. Hopefully that's everything that will be needed for gcc 12 for a version of rustc_codegen_gcc to be able to use upstream gcc 12 libgccjit (and that I didn't break anything). I'm working on a wwwdocs patch for the GCC 12 release notes (for these libgccjit API extensions). Thanks again for all the patches Dave