From: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
To: Antoni Boucher <bouanto@zoho.com>,
"jit@gcc.gnu.org" <jit@gcc.gnu.org>,
"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libgccjit: Fix float playback for cross-compilation
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 13:10:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d39bb6105a3b31460f718990f2f987811a8247b3.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ce5b809b30de16c037120c35859e5180903aa949.camel@zoho.com>
On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 18:42 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> Hi.
> This patch fixes the bug 113343.
> I'm wondering if there's a better solution than using mpfr.
> The only other solution I found is real_from_string, but that seems
> overkill to convert the number to a string.
> I could not find a better way to create a real value from a host
> double.
I took a look, and I don't see a better way; it seems weird to go
through a string stage. Ideally there would be a
real_from_host_double, but I don't see one.
Is there a cross-platform way to directly access the representation of
a host double?
> If there's no solution, do we lose some precision by using mpfr?
> Running Rust's core library tests, there was a difference of one
> decimal, so I'm wondering if there's some lost precision, or if it's
> just because those tests don't work on m68k which was my test target.
Sorry, can you clarify what you mean by "a difference of one decimal"
above?
> Also, I'm not sure how to write a test this fix. Any ideas?
I think we don't need cross-compilation-specific tests, we should just
use and/or extend the existing coverage for
gcc_jit_context_new_rvalue_from_double e.g. in test-constants.c and
test-types.c
We probably should have test coverage for "awkward" values; we already
have coverage for DBL_MIN and DBL_MAX, but we don't yet have test
coverage for:
* quiet/signaling NaN
* +ve/-ve inf
* -ve zero
Thanks
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-24 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-11 23:42 Antoni Boucher
2024-01-24 18:10 ` David Malcolm [this message]
2024-01-25 21:04 ` Antoni Boucher
2024-02-17 16:56 ` Antoni Boucher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d39bb6105a3b31460f718990f2f987811a8247b3.camel@redhat.com \
--to=dmalcolm@redhat.com \
--cc=bouanto@zoho.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jit@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).