From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 103083 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2020 20:35:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jit-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Sender: jit-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 103065 invoked by uid 89); 5 Mar 2020 20:35:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Checked: by ClamAV 0.100.3 on sourceware.org X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 spammy=H*MI:sk:xjftv32, H*i:sk:xjftv32, H*f:sk:xjftv32 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on sourceware.org X-Spam-Level: X-HELO: us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com (HELO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) (205.139.110.61) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 20:35:03 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1583440502; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gZgNiMkHuCt9dVfIe+5p2YXJowMuOeqjHOgOZtvMkQc=; b=VLnlMjqswXJ7wtbFoK8/8+VYUKsLUb7nv2vl7NNJnRfADxNqi+aLapfE8ArFnVqcELr6AW 7LjRQccaqqTTQ1ZVwHYkAGw434p2Qe+KhyCeaks9WTu4EJ8I5p5G5eUpOh0SmkX5ymvVeM gp7PZdV9o0k7Gab4RAIPks1z8d31w/c= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-240-rxwo3DO4NMCS5PqxuhF1Mg-1; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 15:34:57 -0500 X-MC-Unique: rxwo3DO4NMCS5PqxuhF1Mg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE6AD800D4E; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 20:34:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ovpn-116-56.phx2.redhat.com (ovpn-116-56.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.56]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0854A60BE0; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 20:34:54 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: libgccjit maintenance status From: David Malcolm To: Andrea Corallo , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Cc: jit@gcc.gnu.org Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:00:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.5 (3.32.5-1.fc30) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-q1/txt/msg00006.txt On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 19:40 +0000, Andrea Corallo wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to ask about the maintenance status of libgccjit. I'm the maintainer. GCC 10 is currently in stage 4 so making changes may require release-manager signoff. > Personally (in my spare time) I'd like to contribute more to it but I > feel the development is a little stuck and patches don't get > reviewed[1]. Sorry about that. I know I lost some email at the end of last year, and I've been very busy working on the static analyzer [2]. Please ping the list weekly if I'm not getting around to reviewing patches. > More widely speaking we have a feature branch under active > development in emacs.git that relies on libgccjit therefore its > maintenance status is a fundamental information to have. > > Alternatively what can I do to help speed up the review of these > patches? > > Thanks and Regards > > Andrea > > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/jit/2020-q1/msg00002.html > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/jit/2020-q1/msg00001.html I'll take a look at these today. Sorry about the delay Dave [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/DavidMalcolm/StaticAnalyzer