public inbox for jit@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Corallo <Andrea.Corallo@arm.com>
To: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Corallo <Andrea.Corallo@arm.com>,
	"jit@gcc.gnu.org"	<jit@gcc.gnu.org>,
	"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	nd	<nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][gcc] libgccjit: check result_type in gcc_jit_context_new_unary_op
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <gkrwogayx2b.fsf@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1563466038.2530.92.camel@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 823 bytes --]

Hi all,
second version of the patch here addressing comments.

make check-jit runs clean

Bests
  Andrea

gcc/jit/ChangeLog
2019-07-18  Andrea Corallo <andrea.corallo@arm.com>

	* jit-recording.c (unary_op_reproducer_strings): Make it extern.
	(binary_op_reproducer_strings): Likewise.
	* jit-recording.h (unary_op_reproducer_strings): Likewise.
	(binary_op_reproducer_strings): Likewise.
	* libgccjit.c (gcc_jit_context_new_unary_op): Check result_type to be a
	numeric type.
	* libgccjit.c (gcc_jit_context_new_binary_op): Improve error message.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2019-07-04  Andrea Corallo <andrea.corallo@arm.com>

	* jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_context_new_unary_op-bad-res-type.c:
	New testcase.
	* jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_context_new_binary_op-bad-res-type.c:
	Adjust error message.

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: unary_op_check_result_type.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff; name="unary_op_check_result_type.patch", Size: 4977 bytes --]

diff --git a/gcc/jit/jit-recording.c b/gcc/jit/jit-recording.c
index 495ac7f..2f75395 100644
--- a/gcc/jit/jit-recording.c
+++ b/gcc/jit/jit-recording.c
@@ -4888,7 +4888,7 @@ recording::unary_op::make_debug_string ()
 			      m_a->get_debug_string ());
 }
 
-static const char * const unary_op_reproducer_strings[] = {
+const char * const unary_op_reproducer_strings[] = {
   "GCC_JIT_UNARY_OP_MINUS",
   "GCC_JIT_UNARY_OP_BITWISE_NEGATE",
   "GCC_JIT_UNARY_OP_LOGICAL_NEGATE",
@@ -4968,7 +4968,7 @@ recording::binary_op::make_debug_string ()
 			      m_b->get_debug_string_parens (prec));
 }
 
-static const char * const binary_op_reproducer_strings[] = {
+const char * const binary_op_reproducer_strings[] = {
   "GCC_JIT_BINARY_OP_PLUS",
   "GCC_JIT_BINARY_OP_MINUS",
   "GCC_JIT_BINARY_OP_MULT",
diff --git a/gcc/jit/jit-recording.h b/gcc/jit/jit-recording.h
index 13ec7ea..4bd346e 100644
--- a/gcc/jit/jit-recording.h
+++ b/gcc/jit/jit-recording.h
@@ -30,6 +30,9 @@ namespace gcc {
 
 namespace jit {
 
+extern const char * const unary_op_reproducer_strings[];
+extern const char * const binary_op_reproducer_strings[];
+
 class result;
 class dump;
 class reproducer;
diff --git a/gcc/jit/libgccjit.c b/gcc/jit/libgccjit.c
index 23e83e2..eec2f00 100644
--- a/gcc/jit/libgccjit.c
+++ b/gcc/jit/libgccjit.c
@@ -1336,6 +1336,13 @@ gcc_jit_context_new_unary_op (gcc_jit_context *ctxt,
     "unrecognized value for enum gcc_jit_unary_op: %i",
     op);
   RETURN_NULL_IF_FAIL (result_type, ctxt, loc, "NULL result_type");
+  RETURN_NULL_IF_FAIL_PRINTF3 (
+    result_type->is_numeric (), ctxt, loc,
+    "gcc_jit_unary_op %s with operand %s "
+    "has non-numeric result_type: %s",
+    gcc::jit::unary_op_reproducer_strings[op],
+    rvalue->get_debug_string (),
+    result_type->get_debug_string ());
   RETURN_NULL_IF_FAIL (rvalue, ctxt, loc, "NULL rvalue");
 
   return (gcc_jit_rvalue *)ctxt->new_unary_op (loc, op, result_type, rvalue);
@@ -1387,9 +1394,10 @@ gcc_jit_context_new_binary_op (gcc_jit_context *ctxt,
     b->get_type ()->get_debug_string ());
   RETURN_NULL_IF_FAIL_PRINTF4 (
     result_type->is_numeric (), ctxt, loc,
-    "gcc_jit_binary_op %i with operands a: %s b: %s "
-    "has non numeric result_type: %s",
-    op, a->get_debug_string (), b->get_debug_string (),
+    "gcc_jit_binary_op %s with operands a: %s b: %s "
+    "has non-numeric result_type: %s",
+    gcc::jit::binary_op_reproducer_strings[op],
+    a->get_debug_string (), b->get_debug_string (),
     result_type->get_debug_string ());
 
   return (gcc_jit_rvalue *)ctxt->new_binary_op (loc, op, result_type, a, b);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_context_new_binary_op-bad-res-type.c b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_context_new_binary_op-bad-res-type.c
index abadc9f..fbbb2e7 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_context_new_binary_op-bad-res-type.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_context_new_binary_op-bad-res-type.c
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ verify_code (gcc_jit_context *ctxt, gcc_jit_result *result)
 
   /* Verify that the correct error message was emitted.	 */
   CHECK_STRING_VALUE (gcc_jit_context_get_first_error (ctxt),
-		      "gcc_jit_context_new_binary_op: gcc_jit_binary_op 1 with"
-		      " operands a: (int)1 b: (int)2 has non numeric "
-		      "result_type: void *");
+		      "gcc_jit_context_new_binary_op: gcc_jit_binary_op "
+		      "GCC_JIT_BINARY_OP_MINUS with operands a: "
+		      "(int)1 b: (int)2 has non-numeric result_type: void *");
 }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_context_new_unary_op-bad-res-type.c b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_context_new_unary_op-bad-res-type.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fae722a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_context_new_unary_op-bad-res-type.c
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+
+#include "libgccjit.h"
+
+#include "harness.h"
+
+/* Try to create an unary operator with invalid result type.  */
+
+void
+create_code (gcc_jit_context *ctxt, void *user_data)
+{
+  gcc_jit_type *int_type =
+    gcc_jit_context_get_type (ctxt, GCC_JIT_TYPE_INT);
+  gcc_jit_type *void_ptr_type =
+    gcc_jit_context_get_type (ctxt, GCC_JIT_TYPE_VOID_PTR);
+
+  gcc_jit_context_new_unary_op (
+    ctxt,
+    NULL,
+    GCC_JIT_UNARY_OP_LOGICAL_NEGATE,
+    void_ptr_type,
+    gcc_jit_context_new_rvalue_from_int (ctxt,
+					 int_type,
+					 1));
+}
+
+void
+verify_code (gcc_jit_context *ctxt, gcc_jit_result *result)
+{
+  CHECK_VALUE (result, NULL);
+
+  /* Verify that the correct error message was emitted.	 */
+  CHECK_STRING_VALUE (gcc_jit_context_get_first_error (ctxt),
+		      "gcc_jit_context_new_unary_op: gcc_jit_unary_op "
+		      "GCC_JIT_UNARY_OP_LOGICAL_NEGATE with operand "
+		      "(int)1 has non-numeric result_type: void *");
+}

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-22 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-01  0:00 Andrea Corallo
2019-01-01  0:00 ` David Malcolm
2019-01-01  0:00   ` Andrea Corallo [this message]
2019-01-01  0:00   ` Andrea Corallo
2019-01-01  0:00 ` David Malcolm
2019-01-01  0:00   ` Andrea Corallo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=gkrwogayx2b.fsf@arm.com \
    --to=andrea.corallo@arm.com \
    --cc=dmalcolm@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jit@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).