From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 88005 invoked by alias); 1 Jan 2019 21:24:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kawa-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: kawa-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 87985 invoked by uid 89); 1 Jan 2019 21:24:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:756 X-HELO: aibo.runbox.com Received: from aibo.runbox.com (HELO aibo.runbox.com) (91.220.196.211) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 21:24:32 +0000 Received: from [10.9.9.212] (helo=mailfront12.runbox.com) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1geRWY-0001IP-9G; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 22:24:30 +0100 Received: by mailfront12.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:757155 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) id 1geRWT-0003Ji-Ur; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 22:24:26 +0100 Subject: Re: Show all warnings and errors To: Duncan Mak Cc: kawa mailing list References: <93f2d7a1-69f9-9574-7604-ad7a8df2033e@bothner.com> From: Per Bothner Message-ID: <008aca45-bf67-e8db-54dc-76930b6682c8@bothner.com> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2019 21:24:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-q1/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 On 1/1/19 1:15 PM, Duncan Mak wrote: > Hmm, my test runner is just an scm file that loads in a few files. > > It first loads in a file with some R7RS module definitions, and then I > load in some test files. > > Each of my test files look something like this: > > https://gist.github.com/duncanmak/03147dad1cd1697ca9ac3c2a7ee5ca8f > > I'm using SRFI 64 (ha! i just realized that's one of your SRFIs!), > maybe I need to write more code to explicitly instantiate a test > runner? Probably not. First try what I suggested in my previous message, to see where printAll is being called. That could be a place where we should (but don't) call Compilation.maxErrors(). -- --Per Bothner per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/