From: "Sudarshan S Chawathe" <chaw@eip10.org>
To: Kawa mailing list <kawa@sourceware.org>
Subject: Q about format's behavior with ~R directive
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 16:34:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16367.1612474498@localhost> (raw)
With the code
(format #t "~R~%" 100)
I get
hundred
but with the Common Lisp equivalent (I think)
(format t "~R~%" 100)
in SBCL I get instead
one hundred
I am unsure of how tightly specified any of this is, but to me the SBCL
output makes more sense. Is this expected, allowed, by design, a
bug, or something else?
A related question: Is it correct that Kawa uses SLIB's test file for
format (formatst.scm in testsuite) but not SLIB's implementation of
format?
Regards,
-chaw
next reply other threads:[~2021-02-04 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-04 21:34 Sudarshan S Chawathe [this message]
2021-02-04 23:41 ` Charles
2021-02-04 23:42 ` Charles
2021-02-05 1:04 ` Per Bothner
2021-02-05 0:09 ` Per Bothner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16367.1612474498@localhost \
--to=chaw@eip10.org \
--cc=kawa@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).