From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 129413 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2017 14:25:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kawa-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: kawa-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 129391 invoked by uid 89); 19 Mar 2017 14:25:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: homiemail-a18.g.dreamhost.com Received: from sub3.mail.dreamhost.com (HELO homiemail-a18.g.dreamhost.com) (69.163.253.7) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 14:25:55 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D6F258065; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 07:25:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vereq.eip10.org (cpe-74-75-122-130.maine.res.rr.com [74.75.122.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: chaw@eip10.org) by homiemail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA111258062; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 07:25:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chaw by vereq.eip10.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cpbmL-0004av-Do; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 10:25:53 -0400 To: Per Bothner cc: kawa Subject: Re: Threads and the getResult method From: "Sudarshan S Chawathe" Reply-To: "Sudarshan S Chawathe" In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 18 Mar 2017 23:19:13 -0700." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <17663.1489933553.1@vereq.eip10.org> Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 14:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: <17664.1489933553@vereq.eip10.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-q1/txt/msg00088.txt.bz2 > From: Per Bothner > Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 23:19:13 -0700 > Generally, I'm as comfortable (or more so) with patches, since I'm > more familiar with that workflow, especially when I'm the one > submitting changes :-) In this case, since you create a pull request, > I'm happy to do it that way - though a ChangeLog entry would be > appreciated. I just added a ChangeLog entry to the GitLab repo and it seems to have made its way to the merge request. I'll send any future (new) modifications as patches as you suggest. Regards, -chaw