From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailtransmit04.runbox.com (mailtransmit04.runbox.com [IPv6:2a0c:5a00:149::25]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D75643857C46 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 10:48:19 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org D75643857C46 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bothner.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bothner.com Received: from mailtransmit02.runbox ([10.9.9.162] helo=aibo.runbox.com) by mailtransmit04.runbox.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1omv0D-00AocD-Kl for kawa@sourceware.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 12:48:17 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bothner.com ; s=selector1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID; bh=FgqafXbDHzimvwK6NmIFMwAOtcCQA+U+CffLx2PK1qo=; b=JyztyrZCtTbHDG1X+OvXiLLoUO 9s8dkY3q0n9yRlE15EPQxOnGApyW5b3hq7+oIqFRvxl5UCzT7AUvscvsZAXLijAPhRKmhXQfN/+Y1 HdYZGOLy2SMzPBTAIXiuc6oD2M429luuqsHlbmBbhV7RvV25QGGs/VFMLIsnneV1K/8MbezXESbyG PVEuuhuI0xIyoOOu2o4d5r2eJTNBsmDjMc/9yEjtYf5ixFq9FVVHh59xlHqquAyyVlyYL2fY896Wg s0rxtcej24gcvw79ODxtmmPePCs2p+vW+DPxgOPMSvzYDwcQ1QjOXneU1JZ6RICw0FFjnmmKibPGn w05dfZRA==; Received: from [10.9.9.74] (helo=submission03.runbox) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1omv0C-0000Qo-UZ; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 12:48:17 +0200 Received: by submission03.runbox with esmtpsa [Authenticated ID (524175)] (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) id 1omv03-0001Ar-Ie; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 12:48:07 +0200 Message-ID: <2dfbac8a-f12f-afdb-486e-191c61eebe52@bothner.com> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 03:48:02 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.1 Subject: Re: Building for Android Content-Language: en-US To: Panicz Maciej Godek Cc: kawa@sourceware.org References: <0986a08f-c28f-882c-8236-f5f3ecc5cb6a@bothner.com> <3077976f-5161-3069-f540-5fb79ef95665@bothner.com> From: Per Bothner In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 10/24/22 00:22, Panicz Maciej Godek wrote: > I've noticed that, in my code, I've been using the names "hash-code" and "java.lang.System:identity-hash-code". I think it is best to use Java names (such as identityHashCode) for things that come from Java. (I haven't always been consistent about that.) -- --Per Bothner per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/