From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 52327 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2016 23:54:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kawa-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: kawa-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 52315 invoked by uid 89); 23 Oct 2016 23:54:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:210, duh, pictures X-HELO: homiemail-a12.g.dreamhost.com Received: from sub3.mail.dreamhost.com (HELO homiemail-a12.g.dreamhost.com) (69.163.253.7) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 23:54:21 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a12.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a12.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4231030062; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:54:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vereq.eip10.org (cpe-74-75-122-130.maine.res.rr.com [74.75.122.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: chaw@eip10.org) by homiemail-a12.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C22B103005E; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:54:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chaw by vereq.eip10.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bySap-0000tw-30; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 19:54:19 -0400 To: Per Bothner cc: kawa@sourceware.org Subject: Re: (kawa pictures) procedural interface for point and dimension? From: "Sudarshan S Chawathe" Reply-To: "Sudarshan S Chawathe" In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:09:04 -0700." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3466.1477266859.1@vereq.eip10.org> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 23:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: <3467.1477266859@vereq.eip10.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-q4/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2 > Is there any problems with just using the &P[x y] and &D[w h] syntax? No; you are right! It was a "duh" moment on my part. Regards, -chaw