From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 95202 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2020 15:20:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kawa-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: kawa-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 95163 invoked by uid 89); 31 Jan 2020 15:20:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*r:alias X-HELO: aibo.runbox.com Received: from aibo.runbox.com (HELO aibo.runbox.com) (91.220.196.211) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:20:18 +0000 Received: from [10.9.9.202] (helo=mailfront20.runbox) by mailtransmit03.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ixY5f-0008RJ-A4; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 16:20:15 +0100 Received: by mailfront20.runbox with esmtpsa [Authenticated alias (524175)] (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) id 1ixY3D-0000HO-Jw; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 16:17:43 +0100 Subject: Re: Most Kawa-compatible licensing scheme for a new project? To: spellcard199 , "kawa@sourceware.org" References: From: Per Bothner Message-ID: <3df35751-5f1f-c18a-67ec-b1fd1d17f6d0@bothner.com> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:20:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-q1/txt/msg00017.txt On 1/31/20 6:44 AM, spellcard199 wrote: > Scenario 1: > 1. I distribute my project under the MIT - Expat license > 2. Since I've choosen the MIT license, I can't include code > that I have modified after having copied it from Kawa Why not? -- --Per Bothner per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/