From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24083 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2014 17:54:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kawa-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: kawa-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 24073 invoked by uid 89); 21 Feb 2014 17:54:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: aibo.runbox.com Received: from aibo.runbox.com (HELO aibo.runbox.com) (91.220.196.211) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:54:16 +0000 Received: from [10.9.9.209] (helo=mailfront04.runbox.com) by bars.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WGuIc-00064v-3V; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 18:54:10 +0100 Received: from 70-36-239-203.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net ([70.36.239.203] helo=localhost.localdomain) by mailfront04.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:757155 ) (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) id 1WGuI5-0005CU-Lo; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 18:53:38 +0100 Message-ID: <5307929F.5030005@bothner.com> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:54:00 -0000 From: Per Bothner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jamison Hope , "kawa@sourceware.org list" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Was: Re: SRFI-60 References: <530307BD.4070501@bothner.com> <01FB0C75-CF10-420C-BEAB-C18E2052C097@theptrgroup.com> <5305B4C3.40009@bothner.com> <85E8B931-2490-4012-AED7-7EA2B39BA043@theptrgroup.com> <973424F1-CB1A-4361-9641-F277DD55DED1@theptrgroup.com> In-Reply-To: <973424F1-CB1A-4361-9641-F277DD55DED1@theptrgroup.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-q1/txt/msg00058.txt.bz2 On 02/20/2014 05:51 AM, Jamison Hope wrote: > It just happened again. Here's the update for kawa.texi. We should also update the Logical-Number-Operations section. I'm inclined to replace the subsection name "Deprecated Logical Number Operations" by something like "SRFI-60 Logical Number Operations", and adding something about having to use import or require. (Not quite true right now, but it might be a plausible thing to do.) And of course fix the logbit? description, and add any missing functions. It's possible some of these "deprecated" functions aren't SRFI-60; then we'll have to consider what to do. Could you do this, since you just looked into it? -- --Per Bothner per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/